Mobilization, Rejuvenation and Liquidation: Colonialism and Global War

Part of the Themes in Comparative History book series (TCH)


The Second World War poses some difficult interpretive problems when viewed from the perspective of later European decolonizations. The standard textbook theme on this matter is that the impact of total war on the UK’s strategic and, above all, economic capacities was such as to make the loss of empire inevitable, even if the African dénouement was subsequently delayed. In this bald state, however, the argument is facile. The facts were rather to the contrary: the successful orchestration of massive colonial war efforts indicated that Britain still had the leverage to operate an aggressive imperial states-system, if it chose to accept the costs of doing so. In this sense, as John Gallagher has so vividly portrayed, the Second World War was a time of imperial revival, when the traditional collaborative coalitions at the periphery were shocked into a new and powerful, if short-lived, equilibrium.1 On the other hand, quite clearly the 1939–45 conflict did trigger changes at a variety of levels — diplomatic, strategic and economic — which transformed the contexts of European empire and shifted the odds against, not in favour of, their long-term (and sometimes even their short-term) survival.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

2 Mobilization, Rejuvenation and Liquidation: Colonialism and Global War

  1. 1.
    John Gallagher, The Decline, Revival and Fall of the British Empire (Cambridge, 1982) pp. 137–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Richard Storry, Japan and the Decline of the West, 1894–1943 (London, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. E. B. Schumpeter, The Industrialization of Japan and Manchukuo 1930–40: Population, Raw Materials and Industry (London, 1940).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    For an evaluation of Japan’s industrial prospects on the eve of the transformation induced by depression see John E. Orchard, Japan’s Economic Position: The Progress of Industrialization (New York, 1929).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    This shock is reflected in Virginia Thompson, Post-Mortem on Malaya (New York, 1943).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jan Pluvier, South-East Asia from Colonialism to Independence (Kuala Lumpur, 1974) p. 300.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. J. Benda, The Crescent and the Rising Sun: Indonesian Islam and the Japanese Occupation, 1942–45 (The Hague, 1958) p. 172.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    For Sukarno’s position in Indonesian politics during the Japanese occupation see J. D. Legge, Sukarno (London, 1972) pp. 147–80.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    One helpful introductory survey of Vietnamese history in the late colonial period is Ellen Hammer, The Struggle for Indo-China (Stanford, 1954).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The development of the Viet Minh in this period is traced in John T. McAlister, Viet Nam: The Origins of Revolution (Princeton, 1969).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gavin Kitching, Class and Economic Change in Kenya: The Making of an African Petit Bourgeoisie, 1905–1970 (Yale, 1980) pp. 108–50.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. R. Tomlinson, The Political Economy of the Raj, 1914–47: The Economics of Decolonization (London, 1979) pp. 92–100.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    and Rajat K. Ray, Industrialization in India: Growth and Conflict in the Private Corporate Sector, 1914–47 (Delhi, 1979) pp. 188–90, 256–8, 278–9.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    Martin W. Wilmington, The Middle East Supply Centre (New York, 1971).Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    A. R. Prest, War Economies of Primary Producing Countries (Cambridge, 1948).Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    For a broad study of British war finance see R. S. Sayers, History of the Second World War: Financial Policy, 1939–45 (London, 1956).Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    Barrie St. Clair McBride, Farouk of Egypt: a biography (London, 1967) pp. 103–19.Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    The two outstanding accounts are C. Thorne, Allies of a Kind: The United States, Britain and the War against Japan, 1941–5 (Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    and Wm Roger Louis, Imperialism at Bay: The United States and the Decolonization of the British Empire, 1941–45 (Oxford, 1977).Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    David Howorth, The Desert King: The Life of Ibn Saud (London, 1980) pp. 189–94.Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    For an account of the wartime Colonial Office see J. M. Lee and M. Petter, The Colonial Office, War and Development Policy: Organization and the Planning of a Metropolitan Initiative, 1939–45 (London, 1982).Google Scholar
  22. 23.
    US policies in the final phases of the Second World War are delineated in Gabriel Kolko, The Politics of War: Allied Diplomacy and the World Crisis, 1943–45 (London, 1969).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anglo-American differences in the financial and trade spheres are best discussed in R. Gardner, Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy: Anglo-American Collaboration in the Reconstruction of Multilateral Trade (Oxford, 1956).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. J. Morgan, The Official History of Colonial Development. Volume One: The Origins of British Aid Policy, 1924–45 (London, 1982) pp. 198–206.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. J. Moore, Churchill, Cripps and India, 1939–45 (Oxford, 1979).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    This treatment is drawn from I. A. Talbot, ‘Deserted Collaborators: The Political Background to the Rise and Fall of the Punjab Unionist Party, 1923–47’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, xi, No. 1 (October 1982).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A fuller discussion of this question can be found in R. J. Moore, ‘Jinnah and the Pakistan Demand’, Modern Asian Studies, 17, No. 4 (1983).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A full-length, scholarly study of the Indian National Army has yet to be written. K. K. Ghosh, The Indian National Army (Meerut, 1969) tells the story from the conventional nationalist viewpoint.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    See Ronald Lewin, The Chief: Field Marshal Lord Wavell, Commander-in-Chief and Viceroy (London, 1980).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    R. J. Moore, Escape from India: The Attlee Government and the Indian Problem (Oxford, 1983) pp. 16–17, 34–55.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    For a discussion of this issue see Nigel Hamilton, Monty, Master of the Battlefield 1942–44 (London, 1983).Google Scholar
  32. 33.
    The Brazzaville Conference is described in Edward Mortimer, France and the Africans, 1944–60: a political history (London, 1969) pp. 27–49.Google Scholar
  33. 34.
    The evolution of British administrative policies in Africa after the outbreak of the Second World War is traced in R. D. Pearce, The Turning Point in Africa: British Colonial Policy, 1938–48 (London, 1982).Google Scholar
  34. 35.
    Ronald Robinson, ‘Andrew Cohen and the Transfer of Power in Tropical Africa, 1940–51’ in W. H. Morris Jones and Georges Fischer, Decolonization and After: The British and French Experience (London, 1980).Google Scholar
  35. 36.
    N. J. Westcott, ‘Closer Union and the future of East Africa, 1939–48: A case-study in “the official mind of imperialism”’, Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, x, No. 1, (October 1981).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© R. F. Holland 1985

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations