Skip to main content
  • 42 Accesses

Abstract

In 1859, Marx, sketching his intellectual autobiography, remarked that in his critique of Hegelian philosophy fifteen years or so earlier, he had concluded that

legal relations as well as forms of state are to be grasped neither from themselves nor from the so-called general development of the human mind, but rather have their roots in the material conditions of life, the sum total of which Hegel … combines under the name of ‘civil society’, that however the anatomy of civil society is to be sought in political economy. (Marx and Engels, 1950, vol. 1, p. 328)

I would like to thank Susan Himmelweit, Sonja Ruehl and the editors of this book for helpful comments on an earlier draft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.50
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aglietta, M. (1979), A Theory of Capitalist Regulation (London: New Left Books)

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W. J. (1977), ‘The Transformation of Values: What Marx “Really” Meant (An Interpretation)’, Journal of Economic Literature, 12, i, pp. 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm-Bawerk, E. von (1949), Karl Marx and the Close of his System, P. M. Sweezy (ed.) (New York: Augustus M. Kelly).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortkiewicz, L. von (1949), ‘On the Correction of Marx’s Fundamental Theoretical Construction in the Third Volume of Capital’, in P. M. Sweezy (ed.), Karl Marx and the Close of his System (New York: Augustus M. Kelly) pp. 197–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1952), ‘Value and Price in the Marxian System’, International Economic Papers, 2, pp. 5–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colletti, L. (1977), ‘Some Comments on Marx’s Theory of Value’, in J. Schwartz pp. 458–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A., Hindess, B., Hirst, P. and Hussain, A. (1977–78), Marx’s Capital and Capitalism Today, 2 vols, (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobb, M. (1973), Theories of Value and Distribution Since Adam Smith (Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dostaler, G. (1982), ‘Marx’s Theory of Value and the Transformation Problem: Some Lessons from a Debate’, Studies in Political Economy, 9, pp. 77–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson, D. (ed.) (1979), Value: the Representation of Labour in Capitalism (London: CSE Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. (1980), Economic Theory and Ideology (London: Edward Arnold).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. (1982), Theories of the Capitalist Economy (London: Edward Arnold).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, D. K. (1982), ‘The Value of Money, the Value of Labor Power, and the Marxian Transformation Problem’, Review of Radical Political Economics, 14, ii, pp. 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerstein, I. (1976), ‘Production, Circulation and Value: the significance of the “Transformation Problem” in Marx’s Critique of Political Economy’, Economy and Society, 5, pp. 243–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelweit, S. F. and Mohun, S. (1981), ‘Real Abstractions and Anomalous Assumptions’, in I. Steedman et al. pp. 224–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelweit, S. F. and Mohun, S. (1984), ‘Abstraction, Assumption and Commensuration’, in G. Dostaler (ed.), Theorie de la Valeur et Formation des Prix (Paris: Maspero).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. (1980), ‘A Theory of Exploitation Without the Labor Theory of Value’, Science & Society, 44, iii, pp. 257–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilyenkov, E. V. (1977), Dialectical Logic (Moscow: Progress).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilyenkov, E. V. (1982), The Dialectics of the Abstract and the Concrete in Marx’s ‘Capital’ (Moscow: Progress).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipietz, A. (1982), ‘The So-called “Transformation Problem” Revisited’, Journal of Economic Theory, 26, pp. 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, E. (1975), Late Capitalism (London: New Left Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1969), Theories of Surplus Value, Part 2 (London: Lawrence & Wishart).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1973), Grundrisse (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1975), Texts on Method, T. Carver (ed.) (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1976), Capital, vol. 1 (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1978), Capital, vol. 2 (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1981), Capital, vol. 3 (Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1950), Selected Works, 2 vols (London: Lawrence & Wishart).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1976), Collected Works, vol. 6 (London: Lawrence & Wishart).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, R. L. (1973), Studies in the Labour Theory of Value, 2nd edn (London: Lawrence & Wishart).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, R. L. (1977), Smith, Marx and After (London: Chapman & Hall).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pilling, G. (1980), Marx’s ‘Capital’: Philosophy and Political Economy (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. (1951), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, P. Sraffa (ed.), (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosdolsky, R. (1977), The Making of Marx’s ‘Capital’ (London: Pluto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, I. I. (1972), Essays on Marx’s Theory of Value (Detroit: Black & Red).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. (ed.) (1977), The Subtle Anatomy of Capitalism (Santa Monica: Goodyear).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seton, F. (1957), ‘The Transformation Problem’, Review of Economics Studies, 24, pp. 149–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sraffa, P. (1960), The Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, I. (1977), Marx After Sraffa (London: New Left Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, I, et al. (1981), The Value Controversy (London: Verso)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroey, M. de (1981), ‘Value, Production and Exchange’, in I. Steedman et al. pp. 173–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vroey, M. (1982), ‘On the Obsolescence of the Marxian Theory of Value: a Critical Review’, Capital and Class, 17, pp. 34–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. (1981), Capital and Exploitation (London: Edward Arnold).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (1975), ‘An Analysis of South African Capitalism — Neo-Ricardianism or Marxism?’, Bulletin of the Conference of Socialist Economists, 4, i.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaffe, D. (1975), ‘Value and Price in Marx’s Capital’, Revolutionary Communist, 1, pp. 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1985 Zygmunt G. Barański and John R. Short

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mohun, S. (1985). Value Theory. In: Barański, Z.G., Short, J.R. (eds) Developing Contemporary Marxism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17761-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics