Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contemporary Language Studies ((CLS))

  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

The framers of the 1958 Constitution were clearly decided on the place which Parliament would occupy in the new institutional structure. They wanted to retain it as the organisation composed of the people’s elected representatives, and as the body which, in the final analysis, decided whether the Government should continue in office, both of which are characteristic features of Western parliamentary democracy. But they wanted to avoid a state of affairs where Governments were overthrown frequently (un régime dassemblée), as happened during the Fourth Republic and to a lesser extent during the Third Republic. De Gaulle accepted that political parties had their particular function, but not that the traditional forum in which they operated should dominate the political system. His view was that the concept of the separation of powers, a long-established tenet of Western democracy, should be used to establish where Parliament stood in relationship to the Executive, and to distinguish clearly their respective functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliographical guidance

  • N. About, Profession: deputé (Flammarion, 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Avril, Les Français et leur Parlement (Casterman, 1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.-M. Benoit, Chronique de décomposition du PCF (Table Ronde, 1979): despite its title, most of the book is devoted to the author’s account of his constituency campaign in the 1978 elections.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Birnbaum et al. Réinventer le Parlement (Flammarion, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Bourdon, ‘Les Assemblées parlementaires sous la Ve République’, La Documentation Française, Notes et Etudes Documentaires, no. 4463–4 (avril, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Cotta, ‘Partis et Parlement sous la Ve République’, in Pouvoirs, no. 4 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Goguel, ‘Sur la réhabilitation du bicamérisme en France’, in Mélanges -études en l’honneur de Léo Hamon (Economica, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Les Parlements sous la Cinquième République’, special number of Revue Française de Science Politique (février, 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • J.-C. Masclet, Un député pour quoi faire? (PUF, 1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mastias, Le Sénat de la Ve République — réforme et renouveau (Economica, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.-G. Schwartzenberg, La droite absolue, Part II (Flammarion, 1981)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1985 George Malcolm Slater

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slater, M. (1985). Parliament. In: Contemporary French Politics. Contemporary Language Studies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17720-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics