Skip to main content
  • 21 Accesses

Abstract

The mosaic that comprises Sri Lanka’s multiracial society* has since independence presented two pressing problems. The Sinhalese Buddhist majority (Low Country and Kandyan) have had specific economic grievances against the leading ethnic minority, the Ceylon and Indian Tamils, and the principal religious grouping the Roman Catholics in particular, as well as the Protestants (comprising Sinhalese, Tamils and Burghers). By 1978, the Sinhalese Buddhists had had the balance more than redressed on their behalf by successive governments in the post-1956 phase. This has especially been so in the employment, educational and commercial sectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Central Bank of Ceylon, Survey of Ceylon’s Finances 1953 (Colombo 1954), and

    Google Scholar 

  2. Central Bank of Ceylon, Survey of Ceylon’s Consumer Finances 1973 (Colombo, 1974). See also Dr M. A. Fernando’s ‘Employment in the Rural Sector’, Ceylon Daily News, 30 May 1971, and The Educated Unemployed’, Ceylon Daily News, 2 June 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  3. From Minority Right Group, The Tamils of Sri Lanka (London, 1975), p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For detailed information, see D. L. Jayasuriya, ‘Developments in University Education: The Growth of the University of Ceylon (1942–1965)’, University of Ceylon Review, Vol. XXIII (April-October 1965) Nos 1 and 2, pp. 83–153.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See S. U. Kodikara, Indo-Ceylon Relations since Independence (Colombo, 1965), p. 111. Note, at its ninth annual sessions in April 1949, the C.I.C. condemned the provisions of the Ceylon Citizenship Act as ‘humiliating, discriminatory and anti-social’ and the qualifications required under the Indian and Pakistani Residents (Citizenship) Act as being ‘complex and involved, and beyond the capacity of workers with little or no education’ (ibid.). The latter assertion was, considering the education and literacy standards of the Indian population, factually correct.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See, for instance, the speeches of Sir P. Arunachalam, one of the foremost of the Ceylon Tamil leaders in the first quarter of the twentieth century, in S. W. R. D. Bandaranaike (ed.), The Hand Book of the Ceylon National Congress 1919–1928 (Colombo, 1928), pp. 70–97 and 118–43.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For a detailed account see Michael Banks, ‘Caste in Jaffna’, pp. 61–77 in E. R. Leach (ed.), Aspects of Caste in South India, Ceylon and North-West Pakistan, Vol. 2 (Cambridge, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1979 A. Jeyaratnam Wilson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, A.J. (1979). Problems in a Plural Society. In: Politics in Sri Lanka, 1947–1979. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17718-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics