Skip to main content

Abstract

The social security programme is now the largest, accounting for 29 per cent of total expenditure planned for 1984/5. Social security comprises payment of benefits to the elderly, the sick and disabled, the unemployed, widows and orphans, and family and housing benefits, but excludes expenditure on the National Health Service, construction of public housing and various tax allowances and housing reliefs. Some of these are themselves large: retirement pensions account for around half the social security budget, equal virtually the whole defence budget and exceed the education budget.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Social Services Committee of the House of Commons (1982) Second Report, Session 1981–82, Public Expenditure on the Social Services, HC 306, Volume I Report. Volume II Minutes of Evidence and Appendices. (London: HMSO ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Social Services Committee of the House of Commons (1982) Third Report, Session 1981–82, Age of Retirement, HC 26, Volume I Report. Volume II Minutes of Evidence and Appendices. (London: HMSO ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Treasury and Civil Service Committee of the House of Commons (1983): Session 1982/33, The Structure of Personal Income Taxation and Income Support, HC 386, Volume I Minutes of Evidence, 20-I Volume II Appendices, 20-II. ( London, HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B., Gomulka, J., Micklewright J. and Rau N (1982) ‘Unemployment Benefit Duration and Incentives: How Robust is the Evidence?’ Discussion Paper No. 43, SSRC Research Programme on Taxation, Incentives and the Distribution of Income, London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creedy, J. (1982) State Pensions in Britain (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, for the National Institute of Economic and Social Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilnot, A.W. and Morris C.N.,(1983) Private Costs and Benefits of Unemployment: Measuring Replacement Rates’, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 35 (November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Disney, R. (1981) ‘Unemployment Insurance in Britain’, in J. Creedy (ed). The Economics of Unemployment in Britain (London: Butterworths).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemming, R. (1984) Poverty and Incentives: The Economics of Social Security ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M.A., (1983) ‘Tax Policy and Family Welfare’ Discussion Paper No. 52, SSRC Research Programme on Taxation, Incentives and the Distribution of Income, London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minford, P. (1983) Unemployment: Cause and Cure ( Oxford: Mart in Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Narendranathan, W., Nickell, S. and Stern, J. (1983) ‘Unemployment Benefits Revisited’ Discussion Paper No. 153, Centre for Labour Economics, London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogus, A.I. and Barendt, E.M. (1982) The Law of Social Security ( London: Butterworths).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1984 Paul Cockle

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Disney, R. (1984). Social Security. In: Cockle, P. (eds) Public Expenditure Policy, 1984–85. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17623-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics