Abstract
In posing again the traditional question about the ‘best form of government’, we might take a lead (this time around) from an idea prevalent in a philosophical movement which is not expressly political — the phenomenological movement. Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre and other exponents of ‘phenomenology’ (or ‘existential phenomenology’), although they disagree about many things, seem to concur in at least one important insight: there is no possibility of studying consciousness in and for itself; consciousness is always consciousnessof something. In a somewhat parallel fashion, most people in our relativistic social milieu would be inclined to assent to the proposition that there is no validity to the pursuit of an ‘absolutely best’ form of government; in other words, a government can be adjudged ‘best’ only insofar as it is best-for the people who are governed.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Do democracies make more and greater mistakes than other forms of government? … Is not illegal lynching a lesser evil than legal liquidation? What is the difference between slavery, which the democracies abolished, and the labor camps which Soviet Russia has instituted? If we compare the (alleged) low level of universal education in American democracy with the high level of the selective aristocratic system in some European democracies, which is to be preferred? This being settled, how does the favored system compare in promise for humanity with the controlled system of education in Communist Russia?
M. ten Hoor, Freedom Limited
[The ‘old’ liberals, who were suspicious of interference from government in the affairs of the citizenry] had no glimpse of the fact that private control of the new forces of production, forces which affect the life of everyone, would operate in the same way as private unchecked control of political power. They saw the need for new legal institutions, and of different political conditions as a means to political liberty. But they failed to perceive that social control of economic forces is equally necessary if anything approaching economic equality and liberty is to be realised.
John Dewey, Liberalism and Social Action (1935)
The terrifying phenomenon of totalitarianism, which has been born into our world perhaps four times, did not issue from authoritarian systems, but in each case from a weak democracy: the one created by the February Revolution in Russia, the Weimar and the Italian Republics, and Chiang Kai-shek’s China.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, ‘Misconceptions about Russia’
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
There is some unavoidable ambiguity involved in the use of the term, ‘relative’, with respect to government, as T. L. Thorson shows in The Logic of Democracy (NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1967) ch. III.
However, as W. J. Stankiewicz points out in Aspects of Political Theory (London: Macmillan, 1976, pp. 17ff), one can also say that democracy makes the vox populi ‘absolute’.
Mortimer Adler in ‘A Disputation on the Future of Democracy’ (The Great Ideas Today, 1978) p. 27, tries to overcome this standard dichotomy between ‘absolute’ and ‘relative’ by developing the paradox that the state through education and social legislation should bring the less-than-ideal citizens up to the ideal level, so that ‘the best form of government absolutely is also the best relatively for every human group’.
F. Patrick Hubbard, ‘Justice, Limits to Growth, and an Equilibrium State’, in Philosophy and Public Affairs, Summer 1978.
See Roberto Mangabeira Ungar, Knowledge and Politics (NY: Free Press, 1975) Part I.
Yves Simon, Community of the Free, W. Task tr. (NY: Holt, 1947) p. 149.
See Alfonso Damico, Individuality and Community: The Social and Political Thought of John Dewey (Gainesville: University of Flordia Press, 1978) chs 5, 7.
Jane Mansbridge’s Beyond Adversary Democracy (NY: Basic Books, 1980) theorises from this latter standpoint and actually tries to work out the possibilities of homeostasis through illustrative case-studies.
Copyright information
© 1984 Howard P. Kainz
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kainz, H.P. (1984). Is Democracy the Best Form of Government?. In: Democracy East and West. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17596-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17596-3_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-17598-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17596-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)