Advertisement

Observances

  • Henrietta Leyser
Chapter
Part of the New Studies in Medieval History book series

Abstract

The poor men of Christ’: this, first and foremost, was how the hermits saw themselves. Their love of poverty might be expressed as a wish to imitate Christ’s own poverty; Stephen of Obazine, for example, at the start of his pilgrimage, abandoned all earthly concerns ‘so that poor and naked himself he might follow the poor Christ’.1 It might also be seen as a response to Christ’s teaching on poverty. Christ’s advice to the rich man (Matthew xix:21), his warnings on the difficulty for the wealthy in entering the kingdom of heaven, these were the texts frequently quoted to explain and justify the hermits’ conversions. Even if the hermits, as laymen, had not actually read the passages, this did not make them any the less relevant. Here is the foundation charter granted by Henry of Verdun, describing the beginnings of Flône:

He who does not renounce all that he possesses cannot come to me, said the Lord. Having understood rather than read this truth, three faithful laymen, … having given up all worldly desires, chose to live in a solitary house in that place which is called Flône.2

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Vita Stephani... Obazinensis, Bk. 1, Ch. 2, p. 46.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Dereine, Les Chanoines Reguliers au Diocese de Liege avant St. Norbert (Louvain-Paris, 1952), p. 108, n. 4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Memorials of... Fountains, p. 23.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morin, ‘Rainaud l’ermite...’, p. 101.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vita archiepiscopi Magdeburgensis, MGH SS, XII, Norberti, Ch. 9, p. 678.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vita Johannis, Ch. 15. p. 1084.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liber Sententiarum, J. Becquet (ed.), Corpus Christianorum Continuatiu Mediacualis, VIII (Turnhout, 1968), Bk. 1, p. 6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
  9. 9.
    Exordium Cisterciensis coenobii, J. Turk (ed.), Cistercii Statuta Antiquissima, Analecta sacra ordinis cisterciensis, IV (1948), p. 33.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cited in G. Constable, Monastic tithes from their origins to the twelfth century (Cambridge, 1964), p. 137.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. I. Moore ‘Family, community and cult on the Eve of the Gregorian Reform’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, XXX (1980), pp. 54–5.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vita Bernardi, MPL, CLXXII, col. 1384. For this extract in translation, Rosalind Brooke, The Coming of the Friars, Historical Problems: Studies and Documents (London, 1975), p. 50.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    For Gerhoh of Reichersberg see Lester K. Little, Religious Poverty and the Profit Economy in medieval Europe, pp. 110–112.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liber de Restauratione S. Martini Tornacensis, Ch. 68, p. 306.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ‘Monachorum Afflighemeniensium et imprimis b. Fulgentii primi coenobii abbatis statutum de decimis rerum omnium in eleemosynas expendendis’, H. P. Vanderspeeten (ed.), Analecta Bollandiana, IV (1885), p. 254.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rupert of Deutz, In quaedam capitula regula S. Benedicti, MPL, CLXX, col. 517.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Annales Rodenses, p. 692.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    C. Dereine (ed.), ‘Les coutumiers de Saint-Quentin de Beauvais et de Springiersbach’, RHE, XLIII (1948), 437.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cited in C. Dumont, ‘Humanism and rusticity: aim and practice of the early Cistercians’, Cistercian Studies, XVII (1982), 68.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jacques Le Goff, Time, Work and Culture in the Middle Ages, trans. A. Goldhammer (Chicago, 1980), p. 115.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
  22. 22.
    For what follows, Libellus de Diversis Ordinibus et Professionibus qui sunt in Aecclesia, G. Constable and B. Smith (eds), Oxford Medieval Texts (Oxford, 1972), pp. 66–72.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    G. Duby, ‘The Culture of the Knightly Class: Audience and Patronage’, Renaissance and Renewal, pp. 250–1.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tractatus de Conversione Pontii de Larazio, Ch. 16, p. 182.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Libellus de Diversis Ordinibus et Professionibus, p. 66.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rule of Grandmont, J. Becquet (ed.), Corpus Christianorum continuatio mediaevalis, VIII (Turhout, 1968), Ch. XXXVII, p. 86.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liber de Restauratione S. Martini, Ch. 68, p. 306.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    C. Morris, The Christian World, G. Barraclough (ed.) (London, 1981), p. 142.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vita Stephani... Obazinensis, Bk. 11, Ch. 13, p. 114.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Andrew, Vita altera Roberti, Ch. 6, MPL, CLXII, col. 1073.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vita Stephani... Obazinensis, Bk. 1, Ch. 22, p. 76.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vita Romualdi, Ch. 9, p. 31.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vita Stephani... Obazinensis, Bk. I, Ch. 18, p. 72.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    ‘Inédits de S. Pierre Damien’, J. Leclercq (ed.), RB, LXVII (1957), p. 158.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    R. W. Southern, The Making of the Middle Ages, p. 228.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Albert d’Haenens, ‘Quotidienneté et contexte’, p. 576.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ordericus Vitalis, Historia Ecclesiastica, Bk. VIII, pp. 312–26.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ibid., p. 312.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Marbod of Rennes, Ep. VI, MPL, CLXXI, col. 1483.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mary Douglas, Natural Symbols (London, 1970), p. 102.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Henrietta Leyser 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henrietta Leyser

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations