Abstract
The standard approach to the study of political groups has concentrated on political parties and interest or pressure groups. This has led to an underestimation of less conventional kinds of political activity. Thus political scientists for a long time failed to notice that Britons were becoming less enchanted with most of the political parties, and that many people had either lapsed into resigned indifference to politics or were channelling their energies into new kinds of organisation. People look to interest groups, not just parties, to realise their demands, and interest groups have altered in ways that render the conventional classification schemes inadequate.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Guide to Further Reading
Vicky Randal’s Women and Politics (Macmillan, 1982)
David Bouchier’s Idealism and Revolution (Edward Arnold, 1978)
R. Taylor and C. Pritchard, The Protest Makers (Pergamon, 1980).
M. H. Ryle, The Politics of Nuclear Disarmament (Pluto Press, 1981)
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1983 Paul Arthur, Nick Bosanquet, Paul Byrne, Henry Drucker, Patrick Dunleavy, Andrew Gamble, Martin Holmes, Martin Kettle, Joni Lovenduski, Peter Nailor, Gillian Peele, Raymond Plant, R. A. W. Rhodes
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Byrne, P., Lovenduski, J. (1983). Two New Protest Groups: The Peace and Women’s Movements. In: Drucker, H., Dunleavy, P., Gamble, A., Peele, G. (eds) Developments in British Politics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17587-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17587-1_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-38646-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17587-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)