Abstract
The conventional approach to disarmament is to seek agreements that forbid or limit the development or use of specific weapons like nuclear, biological, chemical or other weapons with particularly harmful effects. Although some such agreements have been concluded, the arms race still continues. Vast human and industrial resources are devoted to the development and deployment of new and ever more sophisticated weaponry. Funds that might have been saved through the prohibition of certain kinds of weapons seem to be poured instead into other military fields. Such practices may change the course of armament but do not lead to any genuine disarmament that would reduce the threat to mankind and alleviate the economic burden for many countries by releasing real resources for civilian uses.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1984 Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cars, H.C. (1984). Reduction of Military Expenditure as a Disarmament Concept. In: Rotblat, J., Pascolini, A. (eds) The Arms Race at a Time of Decision. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17485-0_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17485-0_28
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-37649-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17485-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)