Advertisement

The Structural Defects of Periphery Economies

  • Tamas Szentes
Chapter
Part of the International Economic Association Series book series (IEA)

Abstract

Owing to their heavy ideological content and obvious political implications, explanations of the nature and causes of unemployment as well as of ‘underdevelopment’ have always induced heated debates among social scientists. Though history gives a rather clear answer to both questions, the influence of false appearance and the conscious or unconscious representation of vested economic or political interests have produced far more mystifying concepts, misleading ideas and sophisticated doctrines in these than in any other fields of economics.

Keywords

Unskilled Labour Rural Sector International Economic Order Employment Problem Labour Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    See my critique of the conventional theories of ‘underdevelopment’ in T. Szentes, The Political Economy of Underdevelopment (Akademiai, Budapest, 1971, 1973, 1976).Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    See on this point Samir Amin, L’échange Inegal et la hi de la valeur. La fin d’un débat (Editions Anthropos — IDEP, 1973). p. 89Google Scholar
  3. and also Unequal Development (Harvester Press, Sussex, 1976), pp. 1974, 333.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    On these points see, for example, P. P. Streeten, ‘A Critique of Concepts of Employment and Unemployment’, in Richard Jolly, Emanuel de Kadt, Hans Singer and Fiona Wilson (eds), Third World Employment (Penguin Education, 1973) pp. 55–60Google Scholar
  5. and J. Weeks, ‘Does Employment Matter?’, op. cit., pp. 51–5.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    For more detailed explanation of this and also some other points see T. Szentes, ‘Structural roots of the employment problem’, UNESCO, International Social Science Journal, XXVIII, No. 4 (1976), 789–807.Google Scholar
  7. 11.
    See T. Szentes, ‘Migrant Labour System in Black Africa’, ILO Conference on Problems of Employment in Economic Development, International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva, 12–18 December 1963, CEMP. IZ — reprinted in Indian Journal of Economics, VII, No. 182 (1964), 95–118.Google Scholar
  8. 14.
    See Ann Seidman, ‘Old Motives, New Methods: Foreign Enterprise in Africa Today’, African Perspectives (Cambridge University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
  9. 15.
    On this point see also Samir Amin, L’échange inégal… op. cit., pp. 53–65.Google Scholar
  10. 17.
    See W. Arthur Lewis, ‘Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labour’, in The Economics of Underdevelopment (Asia Publishing House, 1957)Google Scholar
  11. and a critique of its applicability by Richard U. Miller, ‘The Relevance of Surplus Labour Theory to the Urban Labour Markets of Latin America’, International Institute for Labour Studies Bulletin, No. 8 (Geneva, 1971) 220–45Google Scholar
  12. 18.
    See Giovanni Arrighi, ‘International Corporations, Labour Aristocracies and Economic Development in Tropical Africa’, in G. Arrighi and J. S. Saul, Essays on the Political Economy of Africa (MRP New York, 1973).Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    For explanation see T. Szentes, ‘How Does the Distorted Socio-Economic Structure Impede the Expansion of Accumulation?’, Studies on Developing Countries, Centre for Afro-Asian Research of the Hungarian Academy for Sciences, No. 54. (Budapest, 1973).Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    On this topic see, for example, René Dumont, False Start in Africa (Sphere Books, 1966) pp. 73–6, 158, and John Hatch’s contribution, ibid., pp. 235–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamas Szentes
    • 1
  1. 1.Hungary

Personalised recommendations