Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Family, Fungibility and Formality: Rural Advantages of Informal Non-farm Enterprise versus the Urban-formal State

  • Chapter
Human Resources, Employment and Development Volume 5: Developing Countries

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

The alleged confusions surrounding the definition of the informal sector (IS) have proved creative. They point to the family mode of production (FMP) as the concept that bridges the gaps among the confused ideas. FMP, the core of IS, is substantial (Section II). It can prosper to the extent that it is concentrated in products, sectors and spaces where FMP’s central advantage — fungibility — can be combined with self-provisioning and advantages of small scale (Section III). This paper stresses the internal, survival-oriented strengths of family productions. Elsewhere, I review its alleged growth-inhibiting, external weaknesses — its supposedly inevitable marginalisation or exploitation by big capital. In practice, FMP’s success-even in appropriate product lines-depends not only on sturdiness due to fungibility (which may go so far as the selection of a spouse for flexibility between producer and consumer activities) but also on location. For demographic, geographic and economic reasons, FMP’s prospects are best in rural areas (Section IV) yet an urban-biased pro-formal state, if it stimulates IS at all, will stress urban ‘small industry’ rather than rural FMP (Section V). This implies that, if IS (or petty commodity production and distribution, PCPD) survives and accumulates,1 it will be due to the sector’s internal economics, rather than to State action.

I am grateful to Drs S. Epstein, M. Howes, H. Schmitz and R. Wade for comments on an earlier draft. Responsibility for errors remains my own. I have not been able to take account of some important works published since this paper was prepared, notably M. Piore and S. Berger, and P. Kriedte et al., Industrialisation before industrialisation (Cambridge, 1982). This paper is complementary to another, under preparation, in which the relationship between FMP, big capital and the State will be reviewed, allowing for these works and other recent evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For a provocative (but ultra-deterministic) argument that ‘self-employed petty producers’ can be a source of growth, let alone transformation, only by replication and self-reproduction as the subordinates of larger-scale capitalism, see C. Gerry, ‘Petty production and capitalist production in Dakar: the crisis of the self-employed’, World Development, 6 (September–October 1978) esp. 1150–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Compare the model of Indonesian agriculture in C. Geertz, Agricultural Involution: The Process of Ecological Change in Indonesia (Berkeley, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Epstein, South India: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow (Macmillan, 1973, pp. 207–11

    Google Scholar 

  4. e.g. in a ‘mode of reproduction rather than production’ as in C. Meillassoux, Jnl. of Peasant Studies, 1, 1, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Schmink, ‘Women and urban industrial development in Brazil’, mimeo for IDS Conference on ‘Women, The Working Poor and the Informal Sector’, IDS, Brighton, 1980, pp. 9–10

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sharecropping may be somewhat less ‘attractive’ than owner-occupancy; for a review of the Marshall-Cheung debate and important recent evidence, see C. Bell, ‘Alternative Theories of Sharecropping: Some Tests Using Evidence from Northeast India’, Jnl. of Dev. Studies, 13, 4 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. The evidence on the size-yield relationship is reviewed in R. A. Berry and W. R. Cline, Agrarian Structure and Productivity in Developing Countries (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1979), especially Appendix A by S. S. Bhalla.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See inter alia M. Lipton, ‘Inter-farm, inter-regional and farm-nonfarm income distribution: the impact of the new cereal varieties’, World Development, 6, 3 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Lipton, ‘Towards a theory of land reform’, in D. Lehmann (ed.), Agrarian Reform and Agrarian Reformism (Faber, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Engels, The Peasant Question in France and Germany, republished in K. Marx and F. Engels, Selected Works (Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow, 1951), Vol. 2, pp. 392–4

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Kautsky, Die Agrarfrange (Dietz, Stuttgart, 1899), pp. 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. Heyzer and K. Young, ‘Women, the working poor and the informal sector: towards a framework of analysis’, mimeo for IDS Conference, IDS, Brighton, 1980, pp. 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Bromley, ‘Introduction: the urban informal sector: why is it worth discussing?’, World Development, 6, 9/10, (1978), 1034–5, claims nine defects of the IS concept, but they are reducible to the three listed by Heyzer and Young.

    Google Scholar 

  14. On ‘concepts with blurred edges’, see L. Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, 2nd edn (Oxford, 1958), p. 34 (I. 71).

    Google Scholar 

  15. On the concept-object relationship without ‘blurred edges’, see G. Frege, ‘On concept and object’, in P. Geach and M. Black (eds), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, 2nd edn (Oxford, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Harriss, ‘Quasi-formal employment structures and behaviour in the unorganised urban economy, and the reverse: some evidence from South India’, World Development, 6, 9/10, (1978), 1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. P. R. Souza and V. E. Tokman, ‘The informal urban sector in Latin America’, International Labour Review, 114, 3 (November–December 1976), 356–7, and 359, fn. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  18. This is avoided, and the methodology thereby much improved in V. E. Tokman in Institute of Social Studies (The Hague) Developing Societies: the Next Twenty-five years (Nijhoff, 1979), where the IS-poverty overlap is shown empirically to be large.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. V. Sethuraman, ‘The informal sector: concept, measurement, policy’, International Labour Review, 114, 1 (July–August 1976), 76

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. P. van Dijk, ‘Success of small enterpreneurs in the informal sector of Ouagadougou (Upper Volta)’, mimeo, IEDES Seminar, Paris, 1979, p. 2, measures it by deducting formal employment and unemployment from the active urban population.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sethuraman, p. 77, states that the ILO samples excluded banking from IS (despite the large informal urban banking sector: T. Timberg, Informal Credit Markets in India (World Bank, August 1979)

    Google Scholar 

  22. G. Garrido-Leca and G. T. O’Mara, The Urban Informal Credit Market in a Developing Country under Financial Repression: the Peruvian Case, Univ. of Texas, 1974) and selected IS enterprises only from ‘manufacturing, construction, transport, trade and services’

    Google Scholar 

  23. See N. Heyzer, ‘Urban poverty, women and the informal sector in selected Third World countries: an overview’, mimeo, IDS, 1979, pp. 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. ILO, Employment, Incomes and Equality: a strategy for increasing productive employment in Kenya (Geneva, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. G. McGee, ‘Peasants in the cities: a paradox, a most ingenious paradox’, Human Organisation (Summer 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. Mazumdar, ‘The urban informal sector’, Staff Working Paper No. 211, World Bank, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  27. K. Hart, ‘Informal income opportunities and urban employment in Ghana’, Journal of Modern African Studies (March 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Middleton, ‘Petty enterprises and relations of production: some inferences from Ecuadorean data’, mimeo, Development Studies Association Conference, Reading, September 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. Moser, ‘Informal sector or petty commodity production: dualism or dependence in economic development?’, World Development, 6, 9/10, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  30. ILO, Employment, Incomes and Equality: a strategy for increasing productive employment in Kenya (Geneva, 1972), p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  31. ILO, Employment, Incomes and Equality: a strategy for increasing productive employment in Kenya (Geneva, 1972), p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  32. ILO, Employment, Incomes and Equality: a strategy for increasing productive employment in Kenya (Geneva, 1972), p. 6

    Google Scholar 

  33. H. W. Singer, H. Lubell, V. Tokman and P. R. Souza, ‘Policies for the urban informal sector in Brazil’, mimeo (Consultants’ Memorandum for ‘Mesa Redonda sobre Politicas de Emprego para o Sector Informal Urbano’, Brazilia, Feb. 1976), ILO, Geneva, 1976, pp. 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  34. For an overview of State action, often with collusion from established IS enterprises, to keep IS newcomers off prime sites, see J. Linn, Policies for Efficient and Equitable Growth of Cities in Developing Countries, Staff Working Paper no. 342, World Bank, 1979, p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Moser, pp. 1060–1, citing and supporting F. Bienefeld and M. Godfrey, ‘Measuring unemployment and the informal sector’, Bull. Inst. Dev. Studies. 6, 3 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  36. To grasp the unviability of these narrow exclusions-by-definition of wage-labour from FMP, consider the practice, in parts of Northern Nigeria, of cash payments between husband and wife for labour on the family farm: P. Hill, Rural Hausa: a village and its setting (Cambridge, 1972).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  37. P. Marris and A. Somerset, African Businessmen: a Study of Enterpreneurship and Development in Kenya (Routledge, 1971), pp. 16–17, 139–140.

    Google Scholar 

  38. C. Moser, ‘Women’s role in a peripheral economy: the case of poor urban women in Guayaquil, Ecuador’, mimeo, IDS conference on ‘Women, the Working Poor and the Informal Sector’, Brighton, 1980, p. 11

    Google Scholar 

  39. R. Bromley, ‘Organisation, regulation and exploitation in the so-called ‘Urban Informal Sector’: the street traders of Cali, Colombia’, World Development, 6, 9/10 (1978), 1162, 1166

    Google Scholar 

  40. See F. Dovring, ‘The share of agriculture in a growing population’, FAO Monthly Bull. Ag. Ec. Stat., VIII, 8–9 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  41. M. Upton, ‘Agricultural Risk, Rural Credit and the Inefficiency of Inequality’, in J. Roumasset, J.-M. Boussard and I. Singh (eds), Risk and Uncertainty in Agriculture, SEARCA and ADC (Manila, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  42. cp. P. Marris, ‘Social perspectives’, in D. Seers and L. Joy (eds), Development in a Divided World (Penguin, 1971), p. 90

    Google Scholar 

  43. C. Lévi-Strauss, The Savage Mind (Weidenfeld, 1966), Ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  44. J. Connell and M. Lipton, Assessing Village Labour Situations in Developing Countries (Oxford (Delhi), 1977), pp. 42–4.

    Google Scholar 

  45. R. Chambers, Health, Agriculture and Rural Poverty: Why Seasons Matter, and R. Chambers et al., Seasonal Dimensions to Rural Poverty: Analysis and Practical Implications, IDS Discussion Papers, IDS, Brighton, December and February 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  46. G. Kirkpatrick, An Analysis of Time Allocation and Labour Supply in the Rural Village Sector of Melanesia, World Employment Programme (Population and Employment Project) (Geneva, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  47. M. Habibullah, Pattern of Agricultural Unemployment Univ. of Dacca, Bureau of Economic Research, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  48. and several studies discussed in J. Connell, Labour Utilisation: an Annotated Bibliography of Village Studies (IDS, 1975)

    Google Scholar 

  49. and B. Dasgupta et al., Village Society and Labour Use (OUP, Bombay, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  50. For a review of the theory (developed from Chayanov, Mellor, Sen and especially Nakajima) see E. Fisk, ‘Response of non-monetary production units to contact with the exchange economy’ in L. Reynolds (ed.), Agriculture in Development Theory (Yale, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  51. See also H. Barnum and L. Squire, A Model of an Agricultural Household, Staff Occasional Paper no. 27, World Bank, Washington, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  52. D. Hunt, ‘Chayanov’s model of peasant household resource allocation and its relevance to Mbere division, Kenya’, Jnl of Devel. Studies, 15, 1 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  53. M. Young and P. Wilmot, Family and Kinship in an East London Suburb (Penguin, 1962), esp. pp. 58–61, 131–42.

    Google Scholar 

  54. P. Lloyd, Slums of Hope? (Pelican, London, 1979), pp. 125–33.

    Google Scholar 

  55. L. Pye, ‘The political implications of urbanisation and the development process’, in G. Breese (ed.), The City in Newly Developing Countries (Prentice-Hall, 1969), p. 402.

    Google Scholar 

  56. V. Tokman, ‘Competition between the informal and formal sectors in retailing: the case of Santiago’, World Development, 6, 9/10 (1978), p. 1196.

    Google Scholar 

  57. In Bombay, only 15.5 % of sampled factory workers were immigrants with below 10 years’ residence — as against 46.4 % of ‘small-scale’ and 61.6% of casual workers (mutually mobile groups, of employees only in this sample, but largely in the IS): Mazumdar, Paradigms in the Study of Urban Labor Markets in LDCs: A Reassessment in the Light of an Empirical Survey in Bombay City Staff Working Paper No 360, World Bank, Washington DC, 1979 p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  58. R. Mohan, Population, Income and Employment in a Developing Metropolis: a Spatial Analysis of Bogota. Colombia, Urban and Regional Reports, no. 79-11, World Bank, Washington, 1979, pp. 84.

    Google Scholar 

  59. M. P. Todaro, ‘A model of labour migration and urban unemployment in LDCs’, Amer. Econ. Rev., 59, 1 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  60. G. B. Richardson, Information and Investment (Oxford, 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  61. A special group of cases is investigated in A. Rapoport and A. Chamnah, Prisoner’s Dilemma (Michigan, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  62. A. K. Sen, ‘Isolation, assurance and the social rate of discount’, Qtly. Jnl. Econ., 81, 1 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  63. R. H. Cassen, India: Population, Economy, Society (Macmillan, 1979), pp. 68–74

    Google Scholar 

  64. A. Day, Roads (Mayflower, 1963), pp. 110–121.

    Google Scholar 

  65. J. Conell et al., Migration from Rural Areas: the Evidence from Village Studies (Oxford U. P. (Delhi), 1976), p. 10

    Google Scholar 

  66. M. Peil, ‘Housing the poor in West Africa: public and private provision’, Bulletin of the Institute of Development Studies, 10, 4. (June 1979), pp. 29–30

    Google Scholar 

  67. UNIDO, Industrialisation and Rural Development (New York, 1978), p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Z. Mars, cited in D. Curtis, ‘Training and administrative development: a Khartoum experiment’, Bull. Inst. Devel. Studies, 10, 4 (1976). 67

    Google Scholar 

  69. J. Hunter, Things Fall Apart (study of firms in Botswana Enterprise Development Unit), IDM, Gaborone, mimeo, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  70. A. Hamer, Lower Income Homeowner Households in a Developing Metropolis, City Studies, Urban and Regional Economics Dept., World Bank, Washington, 1979, pp. 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  71. J. Weeks, ‘Policies for expanding employment in the informal urban sector of developing countries’, Internal. Lab. Rev., 111, 1 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Williams and Tumusiime-Mutebile ‘Capitalist and petty commodity production in Nigeria’, World Development, 6, 9/10 (1978), pp. 1103–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Compare G. Papanek, Pakistan’s Development: Social Goals and Private Incentives (Harvard, 1967), p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Lipton, Botswana: Employment and Labour Use, (Ministry of Finance/EDF, Gaborone, 1979), esp. vol. 2, pp. 217–37

    Google Scholar 

  75. G. Morawetz, ‘Employment implications of industrialisation in developing countries: a survey’, Econ. Jnl., 84 (1974), 525

    Google Scholar 

  76. J. Mueller, ‘Promotion of the manufactures of rural implements in the United Republic of Tanzania’, in UNIDO, Industrialisation and Rural Development (UN, New York, 1978), pp. 89, 102, my italics.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Among recent espousals of higher labour-productivity as the main objective for FMP are F. Bienefeld, ‘The informal sector debate: much ado about something’, mimeo, IDS Seminar on ‘Women, the Working Poor and the Informal Sector’, Brighton, 1980, pp. 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  78. M. Greeley, ‘Rural technology, rural institutions and the rural poorest’, Jnl of Devel. Studies (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Compare B. Harriss, ‘Paddy milling: problems in policy and choice of technology’ in B. Farmer (ed.), Green Revolution? (Macmillan, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  80. For evidence for the propositions in the last two paragraphs, see M. Lipton, ‘Agricultural finance and rural credit in poor countries’, World Development, 4, 7 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  81. and ‘Agricultural Risk, Rural Credit and the Inefficiency of Inequality’, in J. Boussard et al.. (eds.), Risk, Uncertainty and Agricultural Development SEARCA/ADC, Manila/New York, 1976)

    Google Scholar 

  82. van Dijk, ‘Success … Ouagadougou’, p. 9; All-India Debt and Investment Survey 1971–2 (Reserve Bank of India, 1976), pp. 166–9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Sussex, UK

    Michael Lipton

Authors
  1. Michael Lipton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. UN African Institute for Economic Development and Planning, Dakar, Senegal

    Samir Amin (Director) (Director)

Copyright information

© 1984 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lipton, M. (1984). Family, Fungibility and Formality: Rural Advantages of Informal Non-farm Enterprise versus the Urban-formal State. In: Amin, S. (eds) Human Resources, Employment and Development Volume 5: Developing Countries. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17461-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation