The Monopolies and the State

  • Neil Malcolm
Part of the Studies in Soviet History and Society book series (SSHS)

Abstract

It has often been remarked by Western Marxists that ‘the classic writings of Marxism-Leninism’ provide only a sketchy explanation of the functioning of the state in capitalist society. As Ralph Miliband comments, the absence of systematic political theorisation on the part of Marx, Engels and their most prominent successors means in effect that a Marxist politics ‘has to be constructed or reconstructed from the mass of variegated and fragmented material which forms the corpus of Marxism’.1 Such a situation favours the flourishing of a variety of radically differing conceptions of politics, all of which might be described by their authors as Marxist. The fact that such a flourishing did not come about until fifty years after the October Revolution2 is to be explained largely by the peculiar conditions of intellectual life inside the USSR, and by extension inside the world Communist movement. Throughout a long period of increasing theoretical sterility, the official doctrine of ‘State Monopoly Capitalism’ was enforced to the exclusion of all other approaches. When the spell was finally broken, it was in reaction to this doctrine that Western theorists developed their own conceptions. Soviet authors were not, of course, and still are not in a position to abjure State Monopoly Capitalism, or even to offer explicit modifications of it.

Keywords

Resis Arena Mist Lism Mandel 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. Miliband, Marxism and Politics (Oxford University Press, 1977) p. 2.Google Scholar
  2. D. Fernbach, ‘Introduction’, in K. Marx, Surveys from Exile (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973) pp. 9–18;Google Scholar
  3. L. Colletti, ‘Introduction’, in K. Marx, Early Writings (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975) pp. 45–6;Google Scholar
  4. N. Poulantzas, ‘The Problem of the Capitalist State’, in R. Blackburn (ed.), Ideology in Social Science (London: Fontana—Collins, 1972) pp. 238–40;Google Scholar
  5. L. Althusser, ‘The Crisis of Marxism’, Marxism Today, 1978, July, p. 219.Google Scholar
  6. 2.
    D. A. Gold, C. Y. H. Lo and E. O. Wright, ‘Recent Developments in Marxist Theories of the Capitalist State’, Monthly Review, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 29–43;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. D. A. Gold, C. Y. H. Lo and E. O. Wright, ‘Recent Developments in Marxist Theories of the Capitalist State’, Monthly Review, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 3.
    B. Jessop, The Capitalist State (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1982) pp. 33–43;Google Scholar
  9. M. Haynes, Bukharin’s Analysis of State Capitalism, paper delivered to the Conference of Socialist Economists, July 1979, pp. 6–9.Google Scholar
  10. 4.
    V. I. Lenin, ‘The State and Revolution’, in V. I. Lenin, Selected Works (London: Lawrence Wishart, 1969) p. 282.Google Scholar
  11. 5.
    N. Harding, Lenin’s Political Thought, vol. 2 (London: Macmillan, 1981);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. R. Hilferding, Finance Capital: A Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development (London: Routledge – Kegan Paul, 1981);Google Scholar
  13. N. Bukharin, Imperialism and the World Economy (New York: M. Lawrence, 1929).Google Scholar
  14. 6.
    F. Claudin, The Communist Movement: From Comintern to Cominform (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1975) p. 58;Google Scholar
  15. N. Poulantzas, State: Power: Socialism (London: New Left Books, 1978) p. 61;Google Scholar
  16. 8.
    I. V. Stalin, Ekonomicheskie problemy sotsializma v SSSR (Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1952) p. 43;Google Scholar
  17. E. S. Varga, Osnovnye voprosy ekonomiki i politiki imperializma, 1st edn (Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1953) p. 66.Google Scholar
  18. 9.
    P. N. Fedoseev et al. (eds), Osnovy nauchnogo kommunizma (Moscow: Politizdat, 1967) p. 143.Google Scholar
  19. Cf. N. I. Azarov, V. I. Lenin o politike kak obshchestvennom yavlenii (Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1975) passimGoogle Scholar
  20. 10.
    R. B. Day, The ‘Crisis’ and the Crash’—Soviet Studies of the West (1917–1939) (London: New Left Books, 1981).Google Scholar
  21. 11.
    M. Ryndina and G. Chernikov (eds), The Political Economy of Capitalism (Moscow: Progress, 1974) p. 191;Google Scholar
  22. M. Ryndina and G. Chernikov (eds), Programma Kommunisticheskoi Partii Sovetskogo Soyuza (Moscow: Politizdat, 1972) pp. 471–5;Google Scholar
  23. 13.
    N. Poulantzas, Classes in Contemporary Capitalism (London: New Left Books, 1975) pp. 158–9;Google Scholar
  24. 14.
    E. Mandel, Late Capitalism (London: New Left Books, 1975) pp. 516–7.Google Scholar
  25. 15.
    E. Altvater, ‘Some Problems of State Interventionism’, in J. Holloway and S. Picciotto (eds), State and Capital—A Marxist Debate (London: Edward Arnold, 1978) pp. 40–2.Google Scholar
  26. 16.
    B. Jessop, ‘Capitalism and Democracy: the Best Possible Political Shell’, in G. Littlejohn, B. Smart, J. Wakeford and N. Yuval-Davies (eds), Power and the State (London: Croom Helm, 1978) pp. 10–51.Google Scholar
  27. 18.
    Cf. K. Marko’s distinction between ‘popular ideology’, ‘cadre ideology’ and ‘academic ideology’ in his ‘Soviet Ideology and Sovietology’, Soviet Studies, vol. 19 (1968) p. 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 19.
    F. Barghoorn, The Soviet Image of the United States. A Study in Distortion (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1950) p. 28.Google Scholar
  29. 20.
    F. Griffiths, Images, Politics and Learning in Soviet Behavior towards the United States (Doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, 1972) pp. 31–9;Google Scholar
  30. 21.
    E. S. Varga, Izmeneniya v ekonomike kapitalizma v itoge Vtoroi mirovoi voiny (Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1946) p. 38;Google Scholar
  31. E. Varga, Osnovnye voprosy ekonomiki i politiki imperializma, 2nd edn (Moscow: Politizdat, 1957) p. 73;Google Scholar
  32. R. A. Nordahl, ‘Stalinist Ideology: the Case of the Stalinist Interpretation of Monopoly Capitalist Politics’, Soviet Studies, vol. 26 (1974) pp. 239–59;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. F. Barghoorn, ‘The Varga Discussion and its Significance’, The American Slavic and East European Review, vol. 6 (1948) pp. 214–36;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 22.
    R. M. Mills, ‘One Theory in Search of Reality: the Development of United States Studies in the Soviet Union’, Political Science Quarterly, vol. 87 (1972) pp. 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 23.
    E. S. Varga, Ocherki po probleman politicheskoi ekonomii kapitalizma (Moscow: Politizdat, 1964) pp. 51, 55;Google Scholar
  36. S. A. Dalin, Voenno-gosudarstvennyi monopolisticheskii kapitalizm (Moscow: AN SSSR, 1961) p. 328;Google Scholar
  37. I. M. Lemin ‘Istochniki i dvizhushchie sily vneshnei politiki SShA’, in I. M. Lemin (ed.), Dvizhushchie silt’ vneshnei politiki SShA (Moscow: Nauka, 1965) pp. 21–2.Google Scholar
  38. 24.
    G. A. Arbatov, The War of Ideas in Contemporary International Relations (Moscow: Progress, 1973) pp. 238–9.Google Scholar
  39. 26.
    I. D. Levin and V. A. Tumanov (eds), Politicheskii mekhanism diktatury monopolii (Moscow: Nauka, 1974) p. 15.Google Scholar
  40. Cf. F. M. Burlatsky, Lenin, gosudarstvo, politika (Moscow: Nauka, 1970) pp. 266–8;Google Scholar
  41. V. E. Guliev, Sovremennoe imperialisticheskoe gosudarstvo. Voprosy teorii (Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1973) p. 76.Google Scholar
  42. 27.
    V. A. Tumanov, Vozrastanie roli burzhuaznogo gosudarstva i burzhuaznaya ideologiya’, in V. A. Tumanov (ed.), Sovremennye burzhuaznye ucheniya o kapitalisticheskom gosudarstve (Moscow: Nauka, 1967) p. 54.Google Scholar
  43. 29.
    M. Schwartz, Soviet Perceptions of the United States (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California, 1978) p. 40).Google Scholar
  44. 32.
    F. M. Burlatsky and A. A. Galkin, Sotsiologiya Politika. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya (Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1974) pp. 123–55;Google Scholar
  45. 33.
    I. I. Kuz’minov, O gosudarstvenno-monopolisticheskom kapitalizme (Moscow: Gospolitizdat, 1949);Google Scholar
  46. V. I. Khlepikov et al. (eds), O gosudarstvenno-monopolisticheskom kapitalizme (Moscow: Vysshaya Partiinaya Shkola i AON pri TsK KPSS, 1963).Google Scholar
  47. 36.
    S.B. Chetverikov, Kto i kak delaet politiku SShA? (Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1974) pp. 11–12;Google Scholar
  48. N. N. Inozemtsev, Contemporary Capitalism: New Developments and Contradictions (Moscow: Progress, 1974) p. 82.Google Scholar
  49. 41.
    S. P. Peregudov and K. G. Kholodkovsky, ‘Uslozhnenie mekhanizma svyazi butzhuaznogo gosudarstva s gospodstvuyushchim klassom’, in S. P. Peregudov and K. G. Kholodkovsky (eds), Novye yavleniya v mekhanizme politicheskogo gospodstva monopolii, pt 1 (Moscow: IMEMO, 1975) pp. 6–10.Google Scholar
  50. 44.
    A. M. Rose, The Power Structure: Political Process in American Society (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967) p. 1, note.Google Scholar
  51. 46.
    G. W. Domhoff, The Higher Circles: The Governing Class in America (New York: Vintage Books, 1970) pp. 309–55;Google Scholar
  52. C. Wright Mills, The Power Elite (New York: Oxford University Press, 1960);Google Scholar
  53. T. R. Dye, Who’s Running America? The Carter Years (Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall, 1979);Google Scholar
  54. I. Katznelson and M. Kesselman, The Politics of Power: A Critical Introduction to American Government (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1975).Google Scholar
  55. C. Offe, ‘Political Authority and Class Structures—Analysis of Late Capitalist Societies’, International Journal of Sociology vol. 1, no. 1 (1972) pp. 73–105;Google Scholar
  56. F. Block, ‘The Ruling Class Does Not Rule’, in R. Quinney (ed.), Capitalist Society: Readings for a Critical Sociology (Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1979) pp. 128–40.Google Scholar
  57. J. O’Connor, The Fiscal Crisis of the State (New York: St Martin’s Press, 1973) p. 67.Google Scholar
  58. 47.
    A. Szymanski, The Capitalist State and the Politics of Class (Cambridge, Mass.: Winthrop, 1978) p. 272.Google Scholar
  59. 49.
    T. Skocpol, ‘Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: Neo-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal’, Politics and Society, vol. 10, no. 2 (1980) pp. 155–203;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. cf J. Westergaard and H. Resler, Class in a Capitalist Society: A Study of Contemporary Britain (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976) p. 246.Google Scholar
  61. 50.
    R. Nordahl, The Soviet Model of Monopoly Capitalist Politics (Doctoral dissertation, Princeton University, 1972) p. 229;Google Scholar
  62. 52.
    V. Zorin, Monopolii i politika SShA (Moscow: Institut mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii, 1960);Google Scholar
  63. 54.
    G. G. Boichenko, Politicheskaya organisatsiya SShA. Obshchestvennye instituty i ikh vzaimodeistvie s gosudarstvom (Minsk: Belorusskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 1970) p. 192.Google Scholar
  64. 55.
    L. H. Shoup, The Carter Presidency, and Beyond-Power and Politics in the 1980s (Palo Alto, Calif.: Ramparts Press, 1980) pp. 40–1;Google Scholar
  65. 56.
    N. A. Sakharov, Predprinimatel’skie assosiatsii v politicheskoi zhizni SShA (Moscow: Nauka, 1980);Google Scholar
  66. 57.
    L. H. Shoup and W. Minter, Imperial Brains Trust: The Council on Foreign Relations and United States Foreign Policy (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1977) p. 229.Google Scholar
  67. 58.
    G. W. Domhoff, ‘Who Made American Foreign Policy 1945–1963?’, in D. Horowitz (ed.), Corporations and the Cold War (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1969) p. 35.Google Scholar
  68. 59.
    E. A. Zhurikhin, Filantropicheskie’ fondy v sisteme vlasti monopolii (Moscow: Nauka, 1978).Google Scholar
  69. 60.
    A. A. Kokoshin, SSM: za fasadom global’noi politiki (Moscow: Politizdat, 1981) p. 256.Google Scholar
  70. 64.
    I. L. Sheidina, SSM: fabriki mysli’ na sluzhbe strategic (Moscow: Nauka, 1973).Google Scholar
  71. G. A. Trofimenko, SShA: politika, voina, ideologiya (Moscow: Mysl’, 1976).Google Scholar
  72. 65.
    V. S. Zorin, Dollary i politika Vashingtona (Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1964).Google Scholar
  73. V. S. Zorin, Nekoronovannye koroli Ameriki (Moscow: Politizdat, 1967).Google Scholar
  74. 66.
    N. Sivachev and E. Yazkov, History of the USA since World War I (Moscow: Progress, 1976) p. 281.Google Scholar
  75. 67.
    V. Borisyuk, ‘Usilenie politicheskoi aktivnosti amerikanskogo biznesa’, in Peregudov and Kholodkovsky (eds), Novye yavleniya v mekhanizme politicheskogo gospodstva monopolii pt 1, pp. 59–62.Google Scholar
  76. 69.
    E. M. Epstein, The Corporation in American Politics (Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice-Hall, 1969);Google Scholar
  77. R. J. Barber, The American Corporation: Its Power, Its Money, Its Politics (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1970).Google Scholar
  78. 71.
    N. G. Zyablyuk, SShA: lobbizm i politika (Moscow: Mysl’, 1976) p. 81.Google Scholar
  79. 73.
    L. W. Milbrath, The Washington Lobbyists (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1963);Google Scholar
  80. L. A. Dexter, How Organisations are Represented in Washington (Indianapolis, Ind.: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969);Google Scholar
  81. A. Holtzman, Legislative Liaison: Executive Leadership in Congress (New York: Rand McNally, 1970);Google Scholar
  82. K. Schriftgiesser, The Lobbyists: The Art and Business of Influencing Lawmakers (Boston, Mass.: Little, Brown, 1951).Google Scholar
  83. 74.
    S. B. Chetverikov, Kto i kak delaet politiku SShA? (Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1974) pp. 17–18.Google Scholar
  84. 75.
    D. Cater, Power in Washington (New York: Vintage Books, 1964);Google Scholar
  85. 76.
    S. B. Marinin, SShA: politika i upravlenie (Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 1967).Google Scholar
  86. Yu. A. Shvedkov (ed.), SShA: vneshnepoliticheskii mekhanizm (Moscow: Nauka, 1972).Google Scholar
  87. 79.
    D. E. Powell and P. Shoup, ‘The Emergence of Political Science in Communist Countries’, American Political Science Review, vol. 59 (1970) p. 580;Google Scholar
  88. R. Theen, ‘Political Science in the USSR: “To be or not to be?”’, World Politics, vol. 23 (1971) pp. 684–703;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. R. Theen, ‘Political Science in the USSR’, Problems of Communism, vol. 21 (1972) pp. 64–70.Google Scholar
  90. 82.
    F. M. Burlatsky, The Modern State and Politics (Moscow: Progress, 1978) p. 10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Neil Malcolm 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neil Malcolm

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations