Abstract
Transporting nuclear fuel, spent fuel rods and nuclear waste is an integral part of the nuclear fuel cycle. To object outright to this aspect of the fuel cycle is to reject nuclear power as an energy source in the UK’s energy future. That is a position some will find wholly consistent and for them the transportation issue is simply one more aspect of the risks of nuclear power. To others, nuclear power is an essential feature of energy policy, so that the degrees of freedom in debating the transportation issue really relates to: (1) the extent to which its associated risks should dictate the choice of a particular type of fuel cycle, and (2) the mechanisms for minimising that risk. We can then look at both standpoints and ask what they imply, if anything, for the structure of decision-making in the UK.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Pearce, D. W. (1979) ‘Social cost-benefit analysis and nuclear futures’, Energy Economics, 1, No. 2.
Pearce, D. W., Edwards, L. and Beuret, G. (1979) Decision-Making for Energy Futures: a Case Study of the Windscale Inquiry, London: Macmillan.
Wynne, B. (1983) Rationality and Ritual: A Case Study of the Windscale Inquiry, London: British Society for the History of Science.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1984 Greater London Council
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pearce, D.W. (1984). Some Simplifications for Decision-Making. In: Surrey, J. (eds) The Urban Transportation of Irradiated Fuel. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17354-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17354-9_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-36939-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17354-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)