Skip to main content

Nuclear Power — Is it the Only Way?

  • Chapter
  • 7 Accesses

Abstract

Representing Friends of the Earth, I was specifically invited to address the wider question: Do we need nuclear power anyway? Clearly, if the answer to that question is ‘no’ and if we act accordingly, then the problems raised by this conference will no longer exist. While I do not suggest it is automatically appropriate to tackle the side-effects of a policy by abandoning the policy altogether, when in every other respect the policy is highly questionable, then the case for abandoning it to eliminate side-effects becomes much greater. That, in a nutshell, is our point: that we should not need to worry about the urban transportation of irradiated fuel because we do not need the fuel anyway. We are wrongly transporting the wrong product in order to implement the wrong policy for the wrong reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1984 Greater London Council

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson, D. (1984). Nuclear Power — Is it the Only Way?. In: Surrey, J. (eds) The Urban Transportation of Irradiated Fuel. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17354-9_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics