Skip to main content

Something Stronger Than Parties

  • Chapter
Do Parties Make a Difference?
  • 11 Accesses

Abstract

The short answer to the question posed in the title of this book is: Yes, parties do make a difference in the way Britain is governed, but the differences are not as expected. The differences in office between one party and another are less likely to arise from contrasting intentions than from the exigencies of government. Much of a party’s record in office will be stamped upon it by forces outside its control. British parties are not the primary forces shaping the destiny of British society; it is shaped by something stronger than parties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Richard Rose, Ian McAllister and Peter Mair, Is There a Concurring Majority about Northern Ireland? (Glasgow: University of Strathclyde Studies in Public Policy, no. 22, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Stein Rokkan, “Votes Count, Resources Decide,” in Makt og Motiv (Oslo: Glyndal Norskforlag, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peter Hennessy, “Mrs. Thatcher Warned in Secret Report of Certain Defeat in Confrontation with Unions,” The Times, 15 April 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For a detailed discussion of intraparty divisions, see Richard Rose, The Problem of Party Government (London: Macmillan, 1974), chap. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Ken Coates, ed., What Went Wrong? (Nottingham: Institute for Workers’ Control, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walter Bagehot, The English Constitution (London: World’s Classics ed., 1955), chap. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. see Grant Jordan, “Central Coordination, Crossman and the Inner Cabinet,” Political Quarterly 49, no. 2. (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a fuller development of the process, see Richard Rose, “Comparing Public Policy,” European Journal of Political Research 1, no. 1 (1973): 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sir Henry Willink, House of Commons Debates, vol. 426, col. 458 (26 July 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  10. This is assumed already to have happened by S.E. Finer in Adversary Politics and Electoral Reform (London: Anthony Wigram, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ian Waller, “After the Honeymoon,” Sunday Telegraph, 14 October 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michael O’Higgins, “Rolling Back the Welfare State?” in Yearbook of Social Policy in Britain, ed. C. Jones and J. Stevenson (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See, e.g., David Marquand, “Inquest on a Movement,” Encounter, July 1979, pp. 8–18; Roy Jenkins, “Home Thoughts from Abroad”; and Peter Jenkins, “Staggering towards a Socialist Future,” The Guardian, 21 October 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See, e.g., David Marquand, “Inquest on a Movement,” Encounter, July 1979, pp. 8–18; Roy Jenkins, “Home Thoughts from Abroad”; and Peter Jenkins, “Staggering towards a Socialist Future,” The Guardian, 21 October 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 Richard Rose

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rose, R. (1984). Something Stronger Than Parties. In: Do Parties Make a Difference?. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17350-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics