Skip to main content

Money in an Open Economy

  • Chapter
Monetary Theory and Practice
  • 89 Accesses

Abstract

The most notable difference between the US and the UK economies is that the latter is an open economy — indeed its history and circumstances have made the UK more open to external influences than most other countries of a similar size, whereas the USA approximates almost to a figurative closed economy. The interrelationship between domestic monetary developments and the balance of external payments has been close, important and involved in the UK. Moreover, the nature of this relationship has varied, particularly in response to changes in the exchange-rate regime in existence. The change from a regime of pegged, but adjustable, exchange rates — the Bretton Woods system — to a regime of more flexible, but still managed, exchange rates, a change which dates from June 1972 in the UK case, has caused modellers some (continuing) difficulty in adjusting their models to the new system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Artis, M. J. and Lewis, M. K., ‘The demand for money in the United Kingdom’, Manchester School, vol. 44, no. 2, June 1976, pp. 147–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson, P. and Blundell-Wignall, A., ‘Independent monetary policy and the monetary approach to the balance of payments: a model of the monetary sector of the United Kingdom’, mimeo, paper presented at a Money Study Group seminar, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balbach, A. B., ‘The mechanics of intervention in the exchange markets’, Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review, vol. 60, no. 2, February 1978, pp. 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bean, D. L., ‘International reserve flows and money market equilibrium: the Japanese case’, Frenkel and Johnson (eds), The Monetary Approach to the Balance of Payments, pp. 326–37.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coghlan, R. T., ‘A new view of money’, Lloyds Bank Review, no. 129, July 1973, pp. 12–27.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fisher, D., ‘The instruments of monetary policy and the generalised trade-off function of Britain, 1955–68’, Manchester School, vol. 38, no. 3, September 1970, pp. 209–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frenkel, J. A. and Johnson, H. G. (eds), The Monetary Approach to the Balance of Payments, Allen & Unwin, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Goodhart, C. A. E., ‘Monetary policy in the United Kingdom’, in K. Holbik (ed.), Monetary Policy in Twelve Industrial Countries, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 1973, pp. 465–524.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hacche, G., ‘A review of demand for money relationships’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, vol. 14, no. 3, September 1974, pp. 284–305.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hendry, D. F. and Anderson, G. J., ‘Testing dynamic specification in small simultaneous systems: an application to a model of building society behaviour in the United Kingdom’, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper No. 398, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson, H. G. (ed.), Readings in British Monetary Economics, Oxford University Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jonson, P. D., Moses, E. R. and Wymer, C. R., ‘A minimal model of the Australian economy’, Reserve Bank of Australia, Research Discussion Paper No. 7601, November 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kouri, P. J. K. and Porter, M. G., ‘International capital flows and portfolio equilibrium’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 82, pp. 443–67.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kubarych, R. M., ‘Monetary effects of federal reserve swaps’, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review, vol. 2, no. 4, Winter 1977–8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Laidler, D. E. W. and O’Shea, P., ‘An empirical macro model of an open economy under fixed exchange rates: the United Kingdom 1954–70’, Research Report 7810, Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, April 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meltzer, A. H., ‘The conduct of monetary policy and current monetary arrangements’, mimeo, revised draft, January 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Minford, P., Brech, M. and Matthews, K., ‘Speculation and portfolio balance—a model of the UK under floating exchange rates’, University of Liverpool, paper presented at the Konstanz Seminar on Monetary Theory and Policy, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nobay, A. R., ‘A model of the United Kingdom monetary authorities’ behaviour 1959–1969’, in H. G. Johnson and A. R. Nobay (eds), Issues in Monetary Economics, Oxford University Press, 1974, pp. 290–322.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Norton, W. E., ‘Debt management and monetary policy in the United Kingdom’, Economic Journal, vol. LXXIX, no. 315, September 1969, pp. 475–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Posner, M. V. (ed.), Demand Management, Heinemann, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Price, L. D. D., ‘The demand for money in the United Kingdom: a further investigation’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, vol. 12, no. 1, March 1972, pp. 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Savage, D., ‘The channels of monetary influence: a survey of the empirical evidence’, National Institute Economic Review, no. 83, February 1978, pp. 73–89.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Smith, D., ‘A monetary model of the British economy, 1880–1975’, National Westminster Bank Quarterly Review, February 1977, pp. 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Whitman, M. von N., ‘Global monetarism and the monetary approach to the balance of payments’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3: 1975, pp. 491–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zecher, J. R., ‘Monetary equilibrium and international reserve flows in Australia’, in Frenkel and Johnson (eds), The Monetary Approach to the Balance of Payments, pp. 287–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 C. A. E. Goodhart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goodhart, C.A.E. (1984). Money in an Open Economy. In: Monetary Theory and Practice. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics