Skip to main content

Disequilibrium Money — A Note

  • Chapter

Abstract

In recent years there has been a growing application of the concept of ‘disequilibrium’ between the demand for and supply of money, both as a means of elucidating certain monetary developments, i.e. to help explain movements in the observed monetary aggregates [5, 6, 11, 13, 31, 33, 34, 38],2 and, more comprehensively, to treat such disequilibria as one of the major forces driving economic developments in economic models of certain countries, e.g., UK, Australia, USA [15, 16, 20, 31, 32, 41]. However, the basic concept of ‘disequilibrium money’ is contentious (see in particular White [57]), the empirical basis for adopting the approach is debatable, and its application in economic analysis still in a fledgeling stage. It is the aim of this note to explore these issues. The next section discusses some general theoretical and/or partly semantic questions concerning the nature of this disequilibrium. The subsequent section describes evidence from the UK which appears consistent with the existence of disequilibrium money holdings, and difficult to explain in other ways. The final main section considers briefly how adoption of this approach may influence the modelling of the structural form of relationships between monetary developments and the economy more widely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akerlof, G. A., ‘Irving Fisher on his head: the consequences of constant threshold—target monitoring of money holdings’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 93, no. 2, May 1979, pp. 169–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akerlof, G. A. and Milbourne, R. D., ‘The short run demand for money’, Economic Journal, vol. 90, December 1980, pp. 885–900.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Andersen, L. and Jordan, J., ‘Monetary and fiscal actions: a test of their relative importance in economic stabilization’, Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review, vol. 50, no. 11, November 1968.

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  4. Artis, M. J., ‘Monetary policy—part II’, in British Economic Policy 1960–1974, ed. F. T. Blackaby, Cambridge University Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Artis, M. J. and Lewis, M. K., ‘The demand for money in the United Kingdom, 1963–1973’, Manchester School, vol. 44, June 1976, pp. 147–81.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Artis, M. J. and Lewis, M. K., Monetary Control in the United Kingdom, Philip Allan, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barro, R. J., ‘Unanticipated money growth and unemployment in the United States’, American Economic Review, vol. 67, no. 2, March 1977, pp. 101–15.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barro, R. J., ‘Unanticipated money, output and the price level in the United States’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 86, August 1978, pp. 549–80.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Batchelor, R., Griffiths, B., Phylaktis, K. and Wood, G., ‘How tight was monetary policy in 1980’, The City University Centre for Banking and International Finance, Annual Monetary Review, Supplement, March 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baumol, W. J., ‘The transactions demand for cash: an inventory theoretic approach’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 66, November 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carr, J. and Darby, M. R., ‘The role of money supply shocks in the short-run demand for money’, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 8, no. 1, July 1981, pp. 183–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chow, G. C., ‘On the long-run and short-run demand for money’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 74, no. 2, April 1966.

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coats, W. L. Jr, ‘Modeling the short-run demand for money with exogenous supply’, Economic Inquiry, vol. 20, April 1982, pp. 222–39.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coghlan, R. T., ‘A transactions demand for money’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, vol. 18, no. 1, March 1978, pp. 48–60.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Coghlan, R. T., A Small Monetary Model of the UK Economy, Bank of England Discussion Paper No 3, May 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coghlan, R. T., Money, Credit and the Economy, Allen & Unwin, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Courakis, A. S., ‘Monetary targets: conceptual antecedents and recent policies in the US, UK and West Germany’, in Inflation, Depression and Economic Policy in the West, ed. A. S. Courakis, Mansell, 1981, pp. 259–357.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cuthbertson, K. and Foster, N., ‘Bank lending to industrial and commercial companies in three models of the UK economy’, National Institute Review, no. 102, November 1982, pp. 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Darby, M. R., ‘The allocation of transitory income among consumers’ assets’, American Economic Review, vol. 62, no. 5, December 1972, pp. 928–41.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Davidson, J. and Keil, M., An econometric model of the money supply and balance of payments in the United Kingdom, International Centre for Economics and Related Disciplines (ICERD), LSE, Econometrics Discussion Paper No. 27, July 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dornbusch, R., ‘Expectations and exchange rate dynamics’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 84, no. 6, December 1976, pp. 1161–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fisher, D., ‘The demand for money in Britain: quarterly results 1951–1967’, Manchester School, vol. 36, December 1968, pp. 329–44.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Friedman, M. and Meiselman, D., ‘The relative stability of monetary velocity and the investment multiplier in the United States, 1897–1958’, Research Study 2 in Stabilization Policies, prepared by E. Cary-Brown et al. for the Commission on Money and Credit, Prentice-Hall, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Goldfeld, S. M., ‘The demand for money revisited’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 3, 1973, pp. 576–38.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goldfeld, S. M., ‘The case of the missing money’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, no. 3, 1976, pp. 683–730.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goodhart, C. A. E. and Crockett, A. D., ‘The importance of money’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, vol. 10, no. 2, June 1970, pp. 159–98.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hacche, G., ‘The demand for money in the United Kingdom: experience since 1971’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, vol. 14, no. 3, September 1974, pp. 284–305.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hester, D. D. and Pierce, J. L., Bank Management and Portfolio Behaviour, Cowles Foundation Monograph No. 25, Yale University Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Holbrook, R., ‘Optimal economic policy and the problem of instrument instability’, American Economic Review, vol. 12, no. 1, March 1972, pp. 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hotson, A. C., ‘The supplementary special deposits scheme’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, vol. 22, no. 1, March 1982, pp. 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Johnston, R. B. A Disequilibrium Monetary Model of the UK Economy, Bank of England Discussion Paper, Technical Series, forthcoming 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jonson, P.D., Moses, E. R. and Wymer, C. R., ‘The RBA76 model of the Australian economy’, in Conference in Applied Economic Research, Reserve Bank of Australia, December 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Judd, J. and Scadding, J., ‘Liability management, bank loans, and deposit “market” disequilibrium’, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Review, Summer 1981, pp. 21–44.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Judd, J. and Scadding, J., ‘The search for a stable money demand function’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 20, no. 3, September 1982, pp. 993–1023.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kaldor, Lord N., ‘Memorandum of Evidence on Monetary Policy to the Select Committee on the Treasury and Civil Service’, Treasury and Civil Service Committee, Session 1979–80, Memoranda on Monetary Policy, HMSO, 1980, pp. 86–129.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Knoester, A., Theoretical Principles of the Buffer Mechanism, Monetary Quasi-equilibrium and its Spillover Effects, Institute for Economic Research, Discussion Paper Series (7908/G/M), Erasmus University, Rotterdam, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Laidler, D., The Demand for Money: Theories and Evidence, International Textbook Company, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Laidler, D., ‘The demand for money in the United States yet again’, in The State of Macroeconomics: Carnegie—Rochester Conference Series, ed. K. Brunner and A. H. Meltzer, vol. 12, North—Holland, 1980, pp. 219–71.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Laidler, D., On the Short Run Demand for Money and the Real Balance Effect, University of Western Ontario, Research Report No. 8105, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Laidler, D. and Parkin, J. M., ‘The demand for money in the United Kingdom, 1955–1967: preliminary estimates’, Manchester School, vol. 38, September 1970, pp. 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Laidler, D. and Bentley, B., ‘A small macro-model of the post-war United States’, mimeo, University of Western Ontario, July 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  42. MacKinnon, J. G. and Milbourne, R. D., Monetary Anticipations and the Demand for Money, Institute for Economic Research, Queen’s University, Discussion Paper No. 435, Kingston, Ontario, July 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Miller, M. E. and On, D., ‘The demand for money by firms: extensions of analytic results’, Journal of Finance, vol. 23, December 1968, pp. 735–59.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mills, T. C., ‘The information content of the UK monetary aggregates’, Bank of England, mimeo, presented at AUTE Conference, University of Surrey, April 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mishkin, F. S., ‘Does anticipated aggregate demand policy matter? Further econometric results’, American Economic Review, vol. 72, no. 4, September 1982, pp. 788–802.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Norton, W. E., ‘Debt management and monetary policy in the United Kingdom’, Economic Journal, vol. 79, no. 315, September 1969.

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  47. Orr, D., Cash Management and the Demand for Money, Praeger, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Pippenger, J., ‘Monetary policy, homeostasis, and the transmission mechanism’, American Economic Review, vol. 72, no. 3, June 1982, pp. 545–54.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Radcliffe Report, Report of the Committee on the Working of the Monetary System, Cmnd 827, HMSO, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Radecki, L., ‘Short-run monetary control: an analysis of some possible dangers’, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review, Spring 1982, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Reder, M. W., ‘Chicago economics: permanence and change’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 20, no. 1, March 1982, pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Starleaf, D. R., ‘The specification of money demand supply models which involve the use of distributed lags’, Journal of Finance, vol. 25, no. 4, September 1970, pp. 743–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tobin, J., ‘The interest elasticity of transactions demand for cash’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 38, August 1956.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Trundle, J. M., ‘The demand for M1 in the UK’, Bank of England, mimeo, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Tucker, D. P., ‘Macroeconomic models and the demand for money under market disequilibrium’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 3, no. 1, February 1971, pp. 57–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Walters, A. A., ‘Professor Friedman on the demand for money’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 73, no. 5, October 1965, pp. 545–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. White, W. H., ‘The case for and against “Disequilibrium” money’, IMF Staff Papers, vol. 28, no. 3, September 1981, pp. 534–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1984 C. A. E. Goodhart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goodhart, C.A.E. (1984). Disequilibrium Money — A Note. In: Monetary Theory and Practice. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17295-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics