Abstract
In the United Kingdom, defence has come to be seen, rightly or wrongly, as a largely nuclear business. Not only do we share with our allies in NATO a reliance on possible first use of nuclear weapons in the event of a major conflict in Europe, but in many respects the United Kingdom is actually more dependent on nuclear weapons than other countries. No other country in the world has a defence policy involving all of the following three elements of reliance on nuclear weapons: (i) formal military alliance with a nuclear power (the NATO alliance with the USA); (ii) nuclear bases and facilities of an allied state (USA) situated on its territory; and (iii) possession of its own nuclear weapons and delivery systems of various types. We thus have three types of eggs in the increasingly questioned basket of nuclear deterrence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Harold Jackson, ‘US to pull back war centre to Britain’, Guardian, London, 10 December 1982. See also the issues of 11 and 16 December 1982.
Philip Noel-Baker, The Arms Race: A Programme for World Disarmament ( London: Stevens, 1958 ) p. 544.
Roberts, Civilmotstandets teknik ( Centralforbundet Folk och Forsvar, Stockholm, 1976 ) p. 103.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1983 Adam Roberts
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roberts, A. (1983). Britain and Non-Nuclear Defence. In: Baylis, J. (eds) Alternative Approaches to British Defence Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17293-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17293-1_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-36393-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17293-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)