Abstract
In comparative politics generally, comparative foreign policy, and communist studies as well, the study of international—national linkages focused traditionally on states that were largely penetrated by a single external source. For these states it was generally assumed the international—national linkage was the key to explaining internal political development. Dependency theorists in their attempts to explain the internal evolution of Latin American states, for instance, adopted such a focus. The basic satellite model which served students of communist systems well for many years was also of this genre. In that model all sources of external influence save one, even those emanating from other satellites, were excluded. One could predict actions within a state by focusing on decisions taken elsewhere, outside the state, in this instance in Moscow. Indeed, taken to its logical conclusion, the satellite imagery was one in which the putative nation-state was merely another instance of a traditional political institution having been transformed into a transmission belt, that is, into a mechanism for the downward communication of commands.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Samuel P. Huntington, “Transnational Organizations in World Politics,” World Politics, April 1973, pp. 364–5.
Alvin Z. Rubinstein, Yugoslavia and the Non-Aligned World (Princeton University Press, 1970) p. 73.
William Zimmerman, “Issue Area and Foreign Policy Process: A Research Note in Search of a General Theory,” American Political Science Review, 67 (December 1973) pp. 1204–12.
Theodor Lowi, “American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies and Political Theory,” World Politics, 16 (July 1964) pp. 677–715;
Lowi, “Making Democracy Safe for the World: National Politics,” in James N. Rosenau (ed.), Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy ( New York: Free Press, 1967 ) pp. 11–51.
For greater detail, see Fred Singleton, Twentieth Century Yugoslavia ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1976 ) pp. 224–7;
William Zimmerman, “National—International Linkages in Yugoslavia: The Political Consequences of Openness,” in Jan F. Triska and Paul M. Cocks (eds), Political Development in Eastern Europe ( New York: Praeger Publishers, 1977 ) pp. 356–7.
Steven L. Burg, “Decision-Making in Yugoslavia,” Problems of Communism, March–April 1980, pp. 1–20, provides a detailed description of those changes.
At the enterprise level, the changes gave greater meaning to the term self-management. These changes are described in Laura D. Tyson, The Yugoslav Economic System and Its Performance in the 1970s ( Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, 1980 ) pp. 3–30.
Start, 10 December 1980, as reported in Slobodan Stankovic, “‘Dogmatic’ Slovene Leader Gives a ‘Liberal’ Interview,” Radio Free Europe Research, 19 December 1980, pp. 2–3.
Joseph LaPalombara, “Monoliths or Plural Systems? Through Conceptual Lenses Darkly,” Studies in Comparative Communism, vol. 8, no. 3 (Autumn 1975) p. 325.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1983 Michael J. Sodaro and Sharon L. Wolchik
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zimmerman, W. (1983). International—national Linkages and Political Processes in Yugoslavia. In: Sodaro, M.J., Wolchik, S.L. (eds) Foreign and Domestic Policy in Eastern Europe in the 1980s. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17251-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17251-1_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-17253-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17251-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)