Abstract
The objectives of this paper can be briefly presented as follows: (i) to summarise the various empirical results that are established by a systematic pattern of production-factor utilisation — capital and skills — and of size distribution for the manufacturing industries in both industrialised and less industrialised countries; (ii) to summarise the results of an empirical test of the Hirschman hypothesis on the possible determinants of differences in relative industrial productivity as between the industrialised and less industrialised countries, with special reference to Latin America; and (iii) to explore the possible theoretical determinants of the empirically established patterns. For this purpose, three possible effects are suggested: (a) reduction in scale; (b) inflexibility in the central operations of the industrial production processes; and (c) allocation of scarce factors — capital and skills — according to the pattern of relative utilisation observed in the less industrialised countries.1
The author thanks G. K. Boon, R. Magliore, P. A. Reyes, H. Schwartz, D. Schydlowsky, F. Stewart, M. C. Tavares, F. Thoumi and other conference participants for their comments. This paper expresses the author’s viewpoints and does not constitute the official position of the IDB. Translated from Spanish.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chenery, H. B. (1966). ‘Patterns of industrial growth’, American Economic Review, September, 624–54.
CEPAL (1964). La Industria Química en América Latina Naciones Unidas (sales No. 64.11 G. 7).
Hirschman, A. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development (Yale University Press).
Katz, J., Gutkowski, M., Rodriguez, M. and Goity, G. (1978). ‘Productividad, tecnología y esfuerzos locales de investigación y desarrollo’, March. Monograph No. 13 of the IBD/CEPAL Regional Program for Scientific and Technological Research.
Lewis, A. (1965). ‘A Review of Economic Development’ (Richard T. Ely Lecture), American Economic Review. Papers and Proceedings, (May), 1–16.
Leontief. W. (1966). Input-Output Economics (Oxford University Press), p. 51.
Maxwell, P. (1977). ‘Learning and Technical Change in the Steel Plant of Acindar, S. A. in Rosario, Argentina’, August, Monograph No. 4 of the IBD/CEPAL Regional Program for Scientific and Technological Research.
Teitel, S. (1975). ‘Economies of scale and size of plant: the evidence and the implications for the developing countries’, Journal of Common Market Studies, XIII, Nos. 1 and 2, 92–115.
Teitel, S. (1976). ‘Labor homogeneity, skill intensity and factor reversals–an international comparison’, Journal of Development Economics, 3, 355–66.
Teitel, S. (1978). ‘The strong factor intensity assumption: some empirical evidence’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 26, No. 2 (January) 327–39.
Teitel, S. (1978b). ‘Productivity, mechanization and skills: a test of the HirschamanLewis hypothesis for Latin American industry’, World Development (April).
Vietorisz, T. (1966). ‘Programming data summary for the chemical industry’, Industrialization and Productivity Bulletin No. 10, United Nations, New York, pp. 7–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1983 International Economic Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Teitel, S. (1983). Technology and Labour Productivity Patterns in the Manufacturing Industries of Less Industrialised Countries. In: Urquidi, V.L., Reyes, S.T. (eds) Human Resources, Employment and Development. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17214-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17214-6_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-17216-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17214-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)