Skip to main content

Equality of opportunity and equality of results

  • Chapter
Against Equality

Abstract

This [Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America] could have been an important book. Jencks and his colleagues have had the audacity to assemble and reanalyse a wide range of research on inequality, and have demonstrated a high level of technical skill in doing so. But the book misses the opportunity. To show how it comes to miss the opportunity, I must clarify at the outset certain points about inequalities in society. For it is the confusion between different meanings of inequality that leads Jencks and his colleagues to the fundamental difficulties of the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

  1. Barry R. Chiswick and Jacob Mincer, ‘Time Series Changes in Income Inequality in the United States from 1939, with Projections to 1985’, J. of Political Economy, 80 (May–June 1972), pp. S34–S71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1983 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coleman, J.S. (1983). Equality of opportunity and equality of results. In: Letwin, W. (eds) Against Equality. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17175-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics