Skip to main content

Economic justice and the economist

  • Chapter
Against Equality

Abstract

In a recent issue of The Public Interest (vol. 31, Spring 1973), Lester Thurow, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, argued that economic justice requires radical changes in the distribution of income and wealth in this country, and proposed specific redistributive measures. I shall argue three points here:

  1. (a)

    The measures proposed by Thurow are highly questionable.

  2. (b)

    There is no basis in economics for the concept of economic justice from which these measures are derived.

  3. (c)

    The economist has an important role to play in a study and discussion of the distribution of income and wealth, but it is not the role that Thurow set for himself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and references

  1. See, for example, John M. Peterson and Charles T. Stewart Jnr, Employment Effects of Minimum Wage Rates (Washington DC, 1969), and studies cited therein; Marvin Kosters and Finis Welch], ‘The Effects of Minimum Wages on the Distribution of Changes in Aggregate Employment’, American Economic Review, 62 (1972), p. 32

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1983 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Posner, R.A. (1983). Economic justice and the economist. In: Letwin, W. (eds) Against Equality. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17175-0_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics