Abstract
If I understand the common view among modern intellectuals, income redistribution is considered to be a rather simple and almost entirely ethical matter. There are, basically, two theories. The first is that those of us who are well-off use the state as a mechanism for making gifts to the poor. This is well represented by James Rodgers and Harold Hochman in their article, ‘Pareto Optimal Redistribution’.1 The second view, which I shall call the ‘Downsian’, is that in a democracy the poor are able to use their votes to obtain transfers from the rest of society (Anthony Downs [2, esp. pp. 198–201]). These two views are sometimes combined into the view that the bulk of the population takes money from the rich and gives it to the poor by use of the democratic process.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and references
B. Frey, ‘Why Do High Income People Participate More in Politics?’, Public Choice, 11 (Fall 1971), pp. 101–5.
B. R. Fry and R. F. Winters, ‘The Politics of Redistribution’, American Political Science Review, 64 (June 1970), pp. 508–22.
J. Rodgers and H. Hochman, ‘Pareto Optimal Redistribution’, American Economic Review, 59 (Sept. 1969), pp. 542–57.
G. Tullock, ‘A Simple Algebraic Logrolling Method’, American Economic Review, 60 (June 1970), pp. 419–26.
B. Ward, ‘Majority Rule and Allocation’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 5 (Dec. 1961), pp. 379–89.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1983 Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tullock, G. (1983). The charity of the uncharitable. In: Letwin, W. (eds) Against Equality. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17175-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17175-0_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-35313-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17175-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)