Skip to main content

The Manchurian Crisis: 1931

  • Chapter
Soviet Foreign Policy 1930–33

Part of the book series: Studies in Soviet History and Society ((SSHS))

  • 20 Accesses

Abstract

On the 18 September 1931 Japanese forces launched an unauthorised assault on North-Eastern China (Manchuria). The effects of the Depression in Japan and the resurgence of nationalism in China had combined to break the rotting tether which bound the army on the Kwantung peninsula to the restraining hand of Shidehara diplomacy.1 Moscow was directly interested in the crisis because the pretext for aggression was the explosion of a bomb at Mukden on the South Manchurian Railway. Further up the line lay the Chinese Eastern Railway (CER), which the Soviet Government had inherited from its predecessors and defended from forcible seizure by the Nationalists (Kuomintang) and their allies in 1929. Sustained possession of the railway testified to continued preoccupations about the balance of power in the region,2 originally aroused by Japanese military intervention in the Soviet Far East from 1918 to 1922, bolstered by Britain’s bombardment of Nanking in 1927 and consolidated by the consequent conversion of the Kuomintang into a partner of the West. The Russians were not merely passive observers, however. They actively sought the unification of an anti-imperialist China and this, despite the debilitated condition of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), played its part in turning Tokyo against Moscow, at a time when the Depression accentuated Japanese dependence on Manchuria as a secure and vital source of raw materials, as a focus for trade and investment, as well as a place of settlement for “excess” population; likewise the sight of Eastern Siberia’s vast expanse also whetted the appetites of the land hungry in huddled Japan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. For a comprehensive account of the Japanese decision to occupy Manchuria: S. Ogata, Defiance in Manchuria (Berkeley, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Politburo’s special commission on the CER in March 1926 had emphasised the strategic importance of the railroad. A copy of the report was subsequently published by Trotsky in Byulleten’ Oppozitsii, nos 3–4 (5.9.29). Stalin himself appears to have been sceptical of its value. According to Besedovsky, who served in Tokyo as chargé d’affaires, Stalin in 1927 suggested selling the CER as a means of exacerbating the differences between the various capitalist Powers in the Far East — G.Z. Besedovsky, Na Putyakh k Termidoru (Paris, 1930) pp. 137–8. This would appear to conflict with the USSR’s resolute defence of the CER in 1929, but there was a major difference between selling the railway to a willing customer and surrendering it under assault from the Chinese. The Red Army’s action was as much motivated by the need to teach the Kuomintang (and the West) that the USSR would defend its possessions with force if necessary.

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. Dushen’kin, Proletarskii Marshal (Moscow, 1973) p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  4. At the 5 Amur regional party conference on the 11 May 1930 Blyukher, a member of the Dal’kraikom (Far Eastern regional committee), stressed the need to create the Far East’s own military-economic base: Z. Sh. Yanguzov, Osobaya Krasnoznamennaya Da Vnevostochnaya Armiya na Strazhe Mira i Bezopasnosti SSSR (1929–1938 gg.) (Blagoveshchensk, 1970) p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L.N. Kutakov, Istoriya Sovetsko-Yaponskikh Diplomaticheskikh Otnoshenii (Moscow, 1962) pp. 114–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Article 2 of the Portsmouth treaty provided that both parties “refrain from taking any military measures whatsoever on the Russo-Korean frontier, which might threaten the security of Russian or Korean territory”: Mezhdunarodnye Otnosheniya 1870–1918gg: Sbornik Dokumentov, edited by V.M. Khvostov (Moscow, 1940) doc. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A rather pedestrian and uninformative account of his period in Tokyo appears in E.I. Krutitskaya and L.S. Mitrofanova, Polpred Aleksandr Troyanovsky (Moscow, 1975) pp. 54–138.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1983 Jonathan Haslam

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Haslam, J. (1983). The Manchurian Crisis: 1931. In: Soviet Foreign Policy 1930–33. Studies in Soviet History and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17154-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics