Skip to main content

The crisis in education

  • Chapter
Beyond Progressive Education

Part of the book series: Crisis Points series

  • 19 Accesses

Abstract

The major change of the last decade has been the eviction of ‘equal opportunity’ from its place as the central reference point of educational strategy. It is this process that allows us to speak of ‘crisis’. For state education policy, the crisis is a time for restructuring and adaptation: it is not a crisis of survival. For the forces that have, traditionally and most firmly, adhered to the policy of equal opportunity, and associated curricular reforms, it is a crisis of a more serious kind, which contains elements of setback and defeat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See A. Gamble, Britain in Decline (Macmillan, 1981), ch. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Education, 20 April 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 16–19: Learning for Life (Labour Party, 1982), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. DES, Education in Schools: A Consultative Document (HMSO, 1977), pp. 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quoted in Socialist Teachers’ Alliance, Education under the Tories (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. DES Paper to Prime Minister ‘School Education in England: Problems and Initiatives’, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Boyle and A. Crosland in conversation with M. Kogan, The Politics of Education (Penguin, 1971), p. 93.

    Google Scholar 

  8. White Paper, A Framework for Expansion (HMSO, 1972), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  9. OECD, Educational Development Strategy in England and Wales, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ibid, p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  11. James Callaghan, speech at Ruskin College, Oxford, October 1976, quoted in STA, Education under the Tories.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The first Black Paper was The Fight for Education, ed. C. B. Cox and A. E. Dyson (Critical Quarterly Society, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See B. Coard, How the West Indian Child is made Educationally Sub-normal in the British School System (New Beacon Books, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hopkins, The School Debate, ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See N. Wright, Progress in Education (Croom Helm, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Amis, ‘Why Lucky Jim Turned Right’, in What Became of Jane Austen, and Other Questions (Penguin, 1981), p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. Amis, ‘Postscript’ to ‘Lone Voices’ in What Became of Jane Austen (p. 167) explains that the ‘maxim’ was in fact a misquotation of his original ‘More will mean worse’.

    Google Scholar 

  18. For instance, D. Walker in Black Paper 1977, ed. C. B. Cox and R. Boyson (Temple Smith, 1977), pp. 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Amis, ‘Why Lucky Jim Turned Right’, p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See, for example, D. Rubinstein (ed.), Education and Equality (Penguin, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  21. See Ellis et al., William Tyndale: The Teachers’ Story; and J. Gretton and M. Jackson, William Tyndale: Collapse of a School or a System? (Allen & Unwin, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hopkins, The School Debate, ch. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ibid, p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ibid, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ibid, p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See STA, Education under the Tories.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Education, 27 April 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  28. N. St-J. Stevas, Better Schools for All (Conservative Party, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Education, 27 April 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  31. D. Walker, Black Paper 1977, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Education, 27 April 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See C. Chitty, ‘16–19: Learning for Life’, Forum for the Discussion of New Trends in Education, vol. 25, no. 1, Autumn 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Fairley, ‘The Decline of Industrial Training’, Forum, vol. 25, no. 1, Autumn 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Quoted in ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See Appendix to Manpower Services Commission, Youth Task Group Report (MSC, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Fairley, ‘The Decline of Industrial Training’.

    Google Scholar 

  38. N. Kinnock, speech to Socialist Educational Association fringe meeting at Labour Party Conference 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Labour Party, 16–19: Learning for Life, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  40. DES, Progress in Education (HMSO, 1978), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  41. TUC, Note of Comment on the Government’s Consultative Paper ‘Education in Schools’ (TUC, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  42. The Teacher, 19 October 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  43. NUT, ‘Education: The Great Debate’ (duplicated paper, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  44. NUT Memorandum, ‘Priorities and Decision-Taking in the DES’, Tenth Report of Expenditure Committee of the House of Commons, Session 1975–6, Policy-making in the DES (HMSO, 1976), pp. 129–41.

    Google Scholar 

  45. NUT, ‘Education: The Great Debate’.

    Google Scholar 

  46. D. Lawton, The Politics of the School Curriculum (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980); Wright, Progress in Education;

    Google Scholar 

  47. B. Simon, articles in Marxism Today, June 1976, February 1977, July 1977, February 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Rank and File Teacher, no. 50, February 1977.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1983 Ken Jones

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, K. (1983). The crisis in education. In: Beyond Progressive Education. Crisis Points series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17068-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics