Abstract
On a simple level the preservation of order can mean simply the prevention, or suppression, of riots or tumultuous assemblies. But for the historian a problem arises over the definition of ‘order’ in a given period and who makes that definition. From the seventeenth century, at least, the state jurist’s view of order came into conflict with the more negative view found among the poorer groups in society. ‘Order’ for the jurist was an ideal to be achieved; it embraced good behaviour, cleanliness, morality and sobriety, and it thus required the suppression, or tight regulation, of gaming, prostitution, vagabonds and ale houses or cabarets. This view of order appealed also to many men of property, particularly those in urban areas. The Parlements and the police administrations of eighteenth-century France issued ordinances and decrees designed to establish such ‘order’. In eighteenth-century England societies were formed for the suppression of vice; Wilkite tradesmen, while preaching ‘English Liberty’, were happy to use the law to regulate street traders who might undersell them, and prostitutes who distracted their customers. From the late eighteenth century this view of order could involve official prohibition of plebeian sports and pastimes, and in England and parts of the United States the prohibition of drinking at the same time as Sunday church services was extended into regulations generally forbidding Sunday trading.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
See below, pp. 156–7.
Clément, La Police sous Louis XIV, pp. 70–1.
Cameron, Crime and Repression, pp. 212–13 and 227–30; T.J. A. Le Goffand D. M. G. Sutherland, ‘The Revolution and the Rural Community in Eighteenth-Century Brittany’, Past and Present, 62 (1974) 104; A de G XF 12: letter dated 19 Nov. 1770.
Quoted in Lesueur, Le Vrai Mandrin, p. 134; for a general discussion of the problems and the unification of brigades, see Cameron, Crime and Repression, pp. 60–9.
Quoted in Steven L. Kaplan, Bread, Politics and Political Economy in the Reign of Louis XV, (2 vols, The Hague, 1976) 11, p. 566; for the incident in Clinchamp, and others, see A. Garnier, ‘Histoire de la Maréchaussée de Langres: Titre II La repression des emeutes’, Memoires de la société pour histoire du droit et des institutions des anciens pays Bourguignons, Comtois et Romands (1952) pp. 39–41.
Kaplan, Bread, Politics and Political Economy, p. 194–6; Cameron, Crime and Repression, pp. 63–8 and 126.
J. R. Hutchinson, The Press Gang: Afloat and Ashore (1913) pp. 181–3, 193–9, 270 and note;
E. P. Thompson, ‘The Moral Economy of the English Crowd in the Eighteenth Century’, Past and Present, 50 (1971) 129–30; R. A. E. Wells, ‘The Revolt of the South-West 1800–1801: a Study in English Popular Protest’, Social History, VI (1977).
PP Report … on Police of the Metropolis, 1828, p. 76.
J. L. Lyman, ‘The Metropolitan Police Act of 1829’, Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science (1964) ,152.
For this, and similar quotations, see Robert W. Malcolmson, Popular Recreation in English Society 1700–1850 (Cambridge, 1973), pp. 95–7 and 161.
PP Report … on Police of the Metropolis, 1828, pp. 137–42. Scriven, however, stated that ‘in a moral sense, I am not disposed to think that there has been an increase of the quantity of crime’ (p. 134).
‘Principles of Police, and their Application to the Metropolis’, Eraser’s Magazine, XVI (1837) 174.
Storch, ‘Plague of the Blue Locusts’, pp. 64–5.
Weinberger, ‘Police and Public’, pp. 86–8.
PP Report from the Select Committee on Theatrical Licences and Regulations, 1866, qq. 1124–5; Hugh Cunningham, ‘The Metropolitan Fairs: a Case Study in the Social Control of Leisure’, in A. P. Donajgrodzki (ed.), Social Control in Nineteenth-Century Britain (1977).
For the impact of ideology on both rulers and the ruled of eighteenth-century England, see E. P. Thompson, Whigs and Hunters: The Origin of the Black Act (1975) pp. 258–69.
‘The Metropolitan Police System’, Westminster Review, XLV (1874) 49.
Cavanagh, Scotland Yard, pp. 10 and 24–31; Frances Finnegan, Poverty and Prostitution: A study of Victorian Prostitutes in York (Cambridge, 1979) pp. 147–9.
See for example Thomas Woollaston, Police Experiences and Reminiscences of Official Life (West Bromwich, 1884), xerox copy in William Salt Library, Stafford, chapter headed ‘Persistent and Prolonged Complaints against the Police’. There is no consecutive pagination in the book, each chapter starts with its own page 1.
Cameron, Crime and Repression, pp. 207–11; of the thirty men cashiered in 1772 three were noted for brutality, violence and in one case there was an accusation of murder: A de G XF 12.
Weekly Dispatch (1 Nov. 1829); see also 22 Nov.
HO 45.1889.
Canler, Memoires, pp. 105–7; Tulard, La Prefecture, p. 63.
AN F7 12242: Prefect to Min. of Interior (8 Nov. 1836).
Cavanagh, Scotland Yard, pp. 17–21.
HO 45.7487.
ANF7 12241: Sub-Prefect of d’Ambert to Prefect (2 Nov. 1836).
Weber, Peasants into Frenchmen, p. 402.
Quoted in Tulard, La Prefecture, p. 94.
George J. Sheridan, Jnr, ‘The Political Economy of Artisan Industry: Government and the People in the Silk Trade of Lyon 1830–1870’ French Historical Studies (1979) 230.
Miller, ‘Never on Sunday’, pp. 131–4; Miller, Cops and Bobbies, pp. 132–3.
First Report of the Constabulary Commissioners, 1839, p. 160.
Headley, The Great Riots, pp. 20 and 22.
Quoted in Tulard, La Prefecture, p. 63.
WO 33.18, ff. 337 and 371.
Richard Clutterbuck, Protest and the Urban Guerilla (1973) p. 18, states that troops were called out on twenty-four occasions between 1869 and 1910 for the maintenance of public order within the United Kingdom.
HO 45.6750: Home Office to Lord Ward (April 1859).
Quoted in Reith, Democratic Ideal, p. 143. Reith’s criticism of the jury misses the point of the common attitude to the Riot Act discussed in the text and in note 16.
Brian Harrison and Patricia Hollis(eds), Robert Lowery: Radical and Chartist (1979) pp. 221 and 224–45.
Times (3 July 1855).
Troops involved themselves on the side of rioters in London in the Sunday Trading Riots and again in the Garibaldi Riots of 1862. There was little love between soldiers and policemen, and police attempts to arrest drunk and disorderly soldiers could lead to serious trouble with civilian crowds aiding the soldiers. For the London Riots between 1855 and 1867, see Smith, ‘The London Metropolitan Police’, pp. 186–221 and 233–89.
Victor Bailey, ‘The Metropolitan Police, the Home Office and the Threat of Outcast London’, in Bailey (ed.), Policing and Punishment.
HO 45.7326.
HO 45.7319.
Woollaston, Police Experiences.
Williams, Police of Paris, pp. 226–8; Wills, Crime and Punishment, p. 146, note 48.
Chadwick, ‘Consolidation of Police Force’, p. 16.
O’Brien, ‘Urban Growth,’ pp. 247–8.
Adolph Schulze, Aus dem Notizbuch eines Berliner Schutzmannes, Bilder aus dem Leben der Reichshauptstadt (Leipzig, 1887) pp. 14–15, quoted in Thomason, ‘Prussian Police State,’ p. 293.
Copyright information
© 1983 Clive Emsley
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Emsley, C. (1983). Order and the Police. In: Policing and its Context 1750–1870. Themes in Comparative History. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17043-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17043-2_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-28895-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-17043-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)