Skip to main content

Towards Double Negative Economics

  • Chapter
Beyond Positive Economics?

Part of the book series: British Association for the Advancement of Science ((BAAS))

  • 67 Accesses

Abstract

Present-day positive economic theory essentially views the world as being a relatively simple place, certainly in relation to the decision-making capabilities of the human beings who populate that world: however complex the decision problem facing the individual, he or she always takes the best decision with respect to that problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allais, M., and Hagen, O. (eds) (1979) Expected Utility Hypothesis and the Allais Paradox (Dordrecht: Reidel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1962) ‘Irrational Behaviour and Economic Theory’, Journal of Political Economy 70, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, G. (1974) ‘On Utility Functions’, Theory and Decision 5, 205–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P. C. (1981) ‘Nontransitive Measurable Utility’, discussion paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, M. M., Ragade, R. K., and Yager, R. R. (1979) Advances in Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications (Amsterdam: North-Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J. D. (1979) Uncertainty in Microeconomics (Oxford: Martin Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J. D. (1981a) Economics in Disequilibrium (Oxford: Martin Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J. D. (1981b), ‘Are Optimal Search Rules Reasonable? And Vice Versa? (And Does it Matter Anyway?)’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 2, 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey, J. D. (1982) ‘Search for Rules for Search’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979) ‘Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk’, Econometrica 47, 263–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machina, M. J. (1981) ‘“Expected Utility” Analysis without the Independence Axiom’, Econometrica forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radner, R., and Rothschild, M. (1975) ‘On the Allocation of Effort’, Journal of Economic Theory 10, 358–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, J. M., and Reynolds, M. L. (1981) ‘Information Processing and Economic Decision Making’, University of York, discussion paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1980) Experiments on Decisions under Risk (Boston: Martinus Nijhoff).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R., and Loomes, G. (1982) ‘Towards a New Theory of Rational Choice under Uncertainty’, Economic Journal, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1983 The British Association for the Advancement of Science

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hey, J.D. (1983). Towards Double Negative Economics. In: Wiseman, J. (eds) Beyond Positive Economics?. British Association for the Advancement of Science. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16992-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics