Skip to main content

Family, Kin and Law

  • Chapter
The Origins of France

Part of the book series: New Studies in Medieval History ((NSMH))

  • 39 Accesses

Abstract

The family was the basic social unit in post-Roman Gaul, as in almost all human societies; as modern anthropologists have shown, the study of the way in which a society organises its structures of kinship and marriage, out of the immense variety of possibilities, is fundamental for an understanding of how the whole society works. Anthropologists have expended much energy in the investigation of kinship terminology, which can often reveal much about the network of personal relationships. But they have usually been studying static societies, or ones unaffected by the impact of western culture. Ideas about the family and the kin in the early Middle Ages were rapidly changing, as Germanic ideas of the extended kinship group with well-defined legal and social responsibilities met the Roman concept of the individual with considerable personal freedom irrespective of family obligations, and both Roman and Germanic concepts began to take account of Christian ideas of morality. Kinship terminology in this world in which Frankish and Burgundian met Gallo-Roman, classical and Biblical Latin, was likewise in a state of such confusion that no certain historical conclusions can be reached. But it is worthwhile pointing to two Latin words, whose usage begins to introduce us to the alien world of the early medieval family: familia and parentes. The first meant the household, including blood-relations, dependants and slaves; it also meant the serfs who worked for an individual lord; and it was used of that Christian substitute for the natural family, the monastic community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. On this, see J. Le Goff, ‘Peasants and the Rural World …’ (A5-d). There are interesting parallels with nineteenth-century attitudes among the literate: see ‘A Country of Savages’, chapter 1 of E. Weber, Peasants into Frenchmen (London, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vita S. Wandregiseli, 5: M. G. H, S. S. R. M. v p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vita S. Arnulfi, 11: M. G. H, S. S. R. M. III p. 436. Quoted by K. F. Werner in R.H. E. F. LXII (1976) p. 62.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Quoted in P. N. Ure, Justinian and his Age (Harmondsworth, 1951) p. 162.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gregory of Tours, Hist. VII. 45: tr. Thorpe, p. 427.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cartae Senonicae 4: M. G. H., Formulae Merow. et Karol. Aevi p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. M. Wallace-Hadrill has drawn an equally gloomy picture from the archaeological evidence of the excavations of the Merovingian village of Brebières in his Early Medieval History (Oxford, 1975) p. 2: for my reservations see James, in Sawyer, ed. (A3-a) p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Longnon, ed., Polyptyque de Saint-Germain-des-Prés II (Paris, 1886) p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Coleman, in Stuard (A4), a translation of an article originally published in A. E. S. C. XXIX (1974) pp. 315–35.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See K. F. Werner, ‘Problematik und erste Ergebnisse des Forschungsvorha-bens PROL zur Geschichte der west- und mitteleuropäischen Oberschichte bis zum

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jahrhundert’, Quellen und Forschungen LVII (1977) pp. 69–87.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Werner (A4) and Bullough, E. H. R. LXXXV (1970) pp. 74 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boniface, Epist. 26 (ed. Tangl): tr. Emerton, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Boniface, Epist. 33: tr. Emerton, p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  15. F.-L. Ganshof, The Carotingians … (A3-c) p. 245.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Astronomer, Life of Louis the Pious 23.1: tr. Cabaniss, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Devisse, Hincmar (B6-c) p. 376.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. G. H., Leges Nat. Germ. IV (i), Pactus Legis Salicae, ed. Eckhardt, pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ibid., x. p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. G. H., Leges III, Lex Ribvaria 61: ed. Beyerle and Buchner, pp. 108–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marculf II. 12: Uddholm, op. cit., pp. 218–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gregory of Tours, De Gloria Martyrum LXXXI.

    Google Scholar 

  23. The Burgundian Code, 45: tr. Drew, p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liutprand 118: tr. K. F. Drew, The Lombard Laws (Philadelphia, 1973) p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. G. H., Capitularia I, p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lex Ribvaria XI.. 11 : M. G. H., Leges Nat. Germ. III (2) p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gregory of Tours, Hist, IX. 19: tr. Thorpe, p. 50.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tacitus, Germania XXI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1982 Edward James

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

James, E. (1982). Family, Kin and Law. In: The Origins of France. New Studies in Medieval History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16954-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16954-2_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-27052-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16954-2

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics