Abstract
Any analysis of political violence is faced with the fundamental problem of how to delimit its subject. It is surely too narrow a view to consider political violence by marginal and fringe groups as the whole of the matter. Although this is in itself an interesting subject, I think it would probably be wrong to take such a restricted view. An even more limited approach would be to deal with this phenomenon exclusively in terms of ‘political murder’ as has been done by Franklin Ford. The key question is rather whether any such narrow definition of political violence will do, or whether we should approach the phenomenon along other lines of argumentation which lead us into much wider fields. Even though one may not wish to do so, the advisability or otherwise of trying to broaden our definition needs to be discussed, and this is what I should like to say a few words about.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1982 Wolfgang J. Mommsen and Gerhard Hirschfeld
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hobsbawm, E.J. (1982). Political Violence and Political Murder: Comments on Franklin Ford’s Essay. In: Mommsen, W.J., Hirschfeld, G. (eds) Social Protest, Violence and Terror in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-century Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16941-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16941-2_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-16943-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16941-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)