Abstract
This volume contains the first English translation of Emile Durkheim’s The Rules of Sociological Method that does justice in terms of accuracy and elegance to the original text. It also brings together his more interesting subsequent statements (most of them hitherto untranslated) on the nature and scope of sociology and its method.1 They take various forms, including contributions to debates and letters, and show him confronting critics and seeking to clarify his positions. They cover the period between his first major book, The Division of Labour in Society (1893) and his last, The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912). During this period, he not only published and lectured on suicide, the family, crime and punishment, legal and political sociology, the history of socialism, the history of education in France since earliest times, the sociology of morality, primitive classification and the sociology of religion, but he also established the remarkable journal, the Année sociologique (of which twelve fat volumes appeared between 1898 and 1913) and, through it, the Durkheimian school of French sociology. This flourished briefly, until the carnage of the First World War, barely surviving its founder in an increasingly alien intellectual climate between the wars; yet it has had a profound impact on the history of the human sciences in France and outside, from the French Annales school through British social anthropology to American sociology.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Bernard Williams, Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1978) pp. 64–5.
See M. Mauss and P. Fauconnet, ‘Sociologie’, La Grande Encyclopédie (Paris, 1901), vol. 30, p. 166
B. Malinowski, Review of The Elementary Forms in Folklore, 24 (1913) p.525
Thomas Nagel, ‘Subjective and Objective’ in his Mortal Questions (London and New York, Cambridge University Press, 1979) p.206.
W. Van O. Quine, Word and Object (Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1980).
Thomas Nagel, ‘The Limits of Objectivity’ in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, I (1980) edited by S. M. McMurrin (University of Utah Press and Cambridge University Press) p. 78.
Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures (New York, Basic Books, 1973)
Max Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences, trans. E. A. Shils and H. A. Finch (Glencoe, Ill., Free Press, 1949) p. III.
Sheldon Wolin: ‘Max Weber: Legitimation, Method and the Politics of Theory’, Political Theory, 9 (1981), pp.401–24.
Max Weber, ‘Politics as a Vocation’ in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, translated, edited and with an Introduction by H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1948) pp. 121, 123.
F. Simiand, ‘L’Année sociologique 1897’, Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 6 (1898) pp. 652–3.
For a contrasting view, see Bernard Lacroix, Durkheim et le politique (Paris, Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques and Montreal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 1981).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1982 Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Durkheim, E. (1982). Introduction. In: Lukes, S. (eds) The Rules of Sociological Method. Contemporary Social Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16939-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16939-9_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-28072-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16939-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)