Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Contemporary Social Theory

Abstract

This volume contains the first English translation of Emile Durkheim’s The Rules of Sociological Method that does justice in terms of accuracy and elegance to the original text. It also brings together his more interesting subsequent statements (most of them hitherto untranslated) on the nature and scope of sociology and its method.1 They take various forms, including contributions to debates and letters, and show him confronting critics and seeking to clarify his positions. They cover the period between his first major book, The Division of Labour in Society (1893) and his last, The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life (1912). During this period, he not only published and lectured on suicide, the family, crime and punishment, legal and political sociology, the history of socialism, the history of education in France since earliest times, the sociology of morality, primitive classification and the sociology of religion, but he also established the remarkable journal, the Année sociologique (of which twelve fat volumes appeared between 1898 and 1913) and, through it, the Durkheimian school of French sociology. This flourished briefly, until the carnage of the First World War, barely surviving its founder in an increasingly alien intellectual climate between the wars; yet it has had a profound impact on the history of the human sciences in France and outside, from the French Annales school through British social anthropology to American sociology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Bernard Williams, Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry (Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1978) pp. 64–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See M. Mauss and P. Fauconnet, ‘Sociologie’, La Grande Encyclopédie (Paris, 1901), vol. 30, p. 166

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. Malinowski, Review of The Elementary Forms in Folklore, 24 (1913) p.525

    Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas Nagel, ‘Subjective and Objective’ in his Mortal Questions (London and New York, Cambridge University Press, 1979) p.206.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Van O. Quine, Word and Object (Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas Nagel, ‘The Limits of Objectivity’ in The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, I (1980) edited by S. M. McMurrin (University of Utah Press and Cambridge University Press) p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clifford Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures (New York, Basic Books, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Max Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences, trans. E. A. Shils and H. A. Finch (Glencoe, Ill., Free Press, 1949) p. III.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sheldon Wolin: ‘Max Weber: Legitimation, Method and the Politics of Theory’, Political Theory, 9 (1981), pp.401–24.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Max Weber, ‘Politics as a Vocation’ in From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, translated, edited and with an Introduction by H. H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, (London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1948) pp. 121, 123.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Simiand, ‘L’Année sociologique 1897’, Revue de métaphysique et de morale, 6 (1898) pp. 652–3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For a contrasting view, see Bernard Lacroix, Durkheim et le politique (Paris, Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques and Montreal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Steven Lukes

Copyright information

© 1982 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Durkheim, E. (1982). Introduction. In: Lukes, S. (eds) The Rules of Sociological Method. Contemporary Social Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16939-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics