Abstract
The most colourful description of life in the new British settlement of Singapore is contained in the Hikayat Abdullah (The Story of Abdullah) which is the autobiography of the noted teacher of Malay who was also scribe to Stamford Raffles. One of Abdullah’s main concerns is the change brought about by the European presence, ‘the destruction of the old world and the creation of a new’. He is understandably less interested in the historical continuities which, despite the overriding sense of change, can still be discerned. The very readiness of Malay rulers to establish links with British officials in Singapore and Penang was in keeping with previous Malay diplomacy. Like the Dutch and Portuguese, the British simply represented a new and powerful element whose friendship was desirable. Nor was Singapore’s commercial success unprecedented. In the tradition of earlier entrepôts such as Melaka and Johor, its prosperity owed much to its unrivalled geographic position, to which was added the attraction of free trade in an age when tariffs and protection were almost universal. The initial acceptance of the British was also aided by the fact that the areas involved — Penang, Singapore, Province Wellesley and Melaka — had not been forcibly taken from any Malay power and at least the trappings of legality surrounded their transfer. Well before the Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824, the British appeared the legitimate heirs to the prestige formerly accorded the VOC.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and Further Reading
A. H. Hill (ed.), Hikayat Abdullah (Kuala Lumpur, 1970 ), p. 64.
Asa Briggs, The Age of Improvement, 1783–1867 (New York, 1959), p. 3.
The estimates given by T. J. Newbold, Political and Statistical Accounts of the British Settlements in the Straits of Malacca (London, 1839; reprinted Kuala Lumpur, 1971), vol. 2, passim
and in P. J. Begbie, The Malayan Peninsula (Madras, 1834; reprinted Kuala Lumpur, 1967) are often quoted, but modern estimates of the peninsula’s Malay population in the 1830s vary from around 200,000 to 425,000. See, for example
Ooi Jin Bee, Peninsular Malaysia (New York and London, 1976), p. 112
and R. D. Hill, Rice in Malaya: A Study in Historical Geography (Kuala Lumpur, 1977 ), p. 177.
Nicholas Tarring, British Policy in the Malay Peninsula and Archipelago, 1824–71 (Kuala Lumpur, 1969), p. 30.
There is some discrepancy over the year when the Governor of Ligor received this title. Henry Burney’s account indicates that it was before 1811, but official Thai sources give 1822. Lorraine Gesick, review of R. Bonney, Kedah, 1771–1821: The Search for Independence (Kuala Lumpur, 1971) in JSS, 63, 2 (1975), p. 409.
Kassim Ahmad (ed.), Kisah Pelayaran Abdullah (The Story of Abdullah’s Voyages) (Kuala Lumpur, 1970), p. 54; A. H. Hill, op. cit., p. 301. Joget Melayu is a Malay dance performed by two people keeping in step. Skill is judged by one partner’s ability to copy the other’s steps exactly.
Mohd. Taib Osman, ‘Hikayat Sri Kelantan’ ( MA thesis, University of Malaya, 1961 ), p. 53.
A. C. Milner, ‘The Malay Raja: A Study of Malay Political Culture in East Sumatra and the Malay Peninsula in the Early Nineteenth Century’ ( PhD thesis, Cornell University, 1977 ), p. 19.
Robert Pringle, Rajahs and Rebels: The Ibans of Sarawak under Brooke Rule, 1841–1941 ( Ithaca, New York, 1970 ), p. 129.
Wong Lin Ken, ‘The Trade of Singapore, 1819–69’, JMBRAS, 33, 4, (1960), p. 295.
C. M. Turnbull, A History of Singapore 1819–1975 (Kuala Lumpur, 1977), p. 37; John Cameron, Our Tropical Possessions in Malayan India (London, 1865; reprinted Kuala Lumpur, 1965 ), p. 35.
Pringle, op. cit., p. 268; J. M. Gullick, ‘Selangor, 1876–1882. The Bloomfield Douglas Diary’, JMBRAS, 48, 2 (1975), p. 41;
C. M. Turnbull, The Straits Settlements, 1826–67 (Kuala Lumpur, 1972 ), pp. 276–8;
F. L. Dunn, Rain Forest Collectors and Traders: A Study of Resource Utilization in Modern and Ancient Malaya (MBRAS Monograph, no. 5, 1975 ), p. 109.
Carl Trocki, Prince of Pirates: The Temenggongs and the Development of Johor and Singapore, 1784–1885 (Singapore, 1979), pp. 85–117.
Khoo Kay Kim, The Western Malay States, 1850–1873: The Effects of Commercial Development on Malay Politics (Kuala Lumpur, 1972), p. 218.
For a detailed discussion, see C. M. Cowan, Nineteenth Century Malaya: The Origins of British Political Control (London, 1961 ), pp. 43–54
and W. L. Blythe, The Impact of Chinese Secret Societies in Malaya (London, 1969), Chapters 1–4.
Eunice Thio, ‘British Policy towards Johor; from Advice to Control’, JMBRAS, 40, 1 (1967), p. 3.
Barbara Watson Andaya and Virginia Matheson, ‘Islamic Thought and Malay Tradition’, in Anthony Reid and David Marr (eds), Perceptions of the Past in Southeast Asia (Singapore, 1979 ), p. 123.
C. M. Turnbull, ‘Origins of British Control in the Malay States before Colonial Rule’, in J. Bastin and R. Roolvink (eds), Malayan and Indonesian Studies: Essays presented to Sir Richard Winstedt on his eighty-fifth birthday (Oxford, 1964 ), p. 174.
Copyright information
© 1982 Barbara Watson Andaya and Leonard Y. Andaya
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andaya, B.W., Andaya, L.Y. (1982). A ‘New World Is Created’, 1819–74. In: A History of Malaysia. Macmillan Asian Histories Series. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16927-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16927-6_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-27673-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16927-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)