Skip to main content

Endings

  • Chapter
  • 7 Accesses

Part of the book series: Macmillan Modern Dramatists

Abstract

Between 1916 (Bound East for Cardiff) and 1934 (Days Without End) O’Neill had a full and varied theatrical life. Within these years Broadway saw thirty-four of his plays; on thirty-three of these (Dynamo excepted) O’Neill worked closely until their production, attending rehearsals, making last-minute changes, talking with directors and actors. That is, he was actively involved not only in the writing but also in the production of his plays. Had he stopped writing in 1934, his reputation as America’s finest dramatist would have remained positive. Days Without End could have ended the career of a dramatist who had totally committed himself to his art, who was exhausted, physically and perhaps spiritually (despite the ‘positive’ ending of Days Without End), and who could have rested on the laurels of the past, justifiably proud of his considerable accomplishment. What is remarkable is that O’Neill — silent for twelve years, with no new O’Neill play to appear on Broadway until 1946 — is now ready to write the plays of his history cycle, a task left unfinished, and to write the four plays that are among his finest accomplishments — The Iceman Cometh, Hughie, Long Day’s Journey Into Night, A Moon for the Misbegotten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gelbs, p. 831.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ibid., p. 871.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lawrence Langner, quoted in John Henry Raleigh (ed.), The Iceman Cometh: A Collection of Critical Essays (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1968) p. 20. Hereafter cited as Raleigh, Iceman.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The phrase belongs to Raleigh, introduction to Iceman, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sheaffer, Artist, p. 572.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jose Quintero, quoted in Raleigh, Iceman, pp. 32–3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eric Bentley, ‘Trying to Like O’Neill’, in Raleigh, Iceman, pp. 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  8. For fine discussions of the choric element in The Iceman Cometh, see Tiusanen, O’Neill’s Scenic Images, pp. 273–7, and Chabrowe, Ritual and Pathos, pp. 91–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Two perceptive discussions of O’Neill’s existential view in The Iceman Cometh are Robert Brustein, The Iceman Cometh’, in Raleigh, Iceman, pp. 92–102

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Dennis Rich, ‘Exile without Remedy: The Late Plays of Eugene O’Neill’, in Virginia Floyd (ed.), Eugene O’Neill: A World View (New York: Frederick Ungar, 1979) pp. 257–76. Hereafter cited as Floyd, A World View.

    Google Scholar 

  11. ’Critics’ Roundtable’, New York Theatre Review (March 1978) 22.

    Google Scholar 

  12. George Jean Nathan, in Raleigh, Iceman, pp. 26–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sheaffer, Artist, p. 521.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Raleigh, The Plays of Eugene O’Neill, p. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mary McCarthy, in Cargill, O’Neill and his Plays, p. 209.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Richard Watts, Jr, in Miller, Playwright’s Progress, p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1982 Normand Berlin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Berlin, N. (1982). Endings. In: Eugene O’Neill. Macmillan Modern Dramatists. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16913-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics