Abstract
The appearance of systematic barriers to economic advance in the course of capitalist expansion—the “development of under-development”—has posed difficult problems for Marxist theory. There has arisen, in response, a strong tendency sharply to revise Marx’s conceptions regarding economic development. In part, this has been a healthy reaction to the Marx of the Manifesto, who envisioned a more or less direct and inevitable process of capitalist expansion: undermining old modes of production, replacing them with capitalist social productive relations and, on this basis, setting off a process of capital accumulation and economic development more or less following the pattern of the original homelands of capitalism. […].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Andre Gunder Frank, Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1969), pp. 14–15.
Andre Gunder Frank, Lumpenbourgeoisie, Lumpendevelopment (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1972), p. 23 (emphasis added).
See Andre Gunder Frank, “Not Feudalism—Capitalism,” Monthly Review (December 1963): 468–78 and passim.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1982 Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brenner, R. (1982). The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism. In: Alavi, H., Shanin, T. (eds) Introduction to the Sociology of “Developing Societies”. Sociology of “Developing Societies”. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16847-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16847-7_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-27562-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16847-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)