Comments on Laidler and Sumner and Zis

  • Geoffrey E. J. Dennis

Abstract

Through the use of alternative approaches these two papers come to different conclusions on the fixed versus floating exchange rate debate in 1980. Laidler presents a pragmatic and persuasive case for floating rates without stating the positive merits of the fixed rate alternative, while Sumner and Zis present a useful survey of the theoretical literature on the relationships between exchange rates and inflation, and by rectifying certain faults of the literature conclude that floating rates exhibit an inflation bias.

Keywords

Europe Parkin 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bilson, J. F. O. (1979) ‘The Vicious Circle Hypothesis’, International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, vol. 26.Google Scholar
  2. Parkin, M. (1976) ‘Monetary Union and Stabilisation Policy in the European Community’, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, September, vol. 76, no. 118.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© M. T. Sumner and G. Zis 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey E. J. Dennis

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations