Abstract
Jürgen Habermas has demonstrated the possibility in the West of a process of democratisation that shows the limits of technocratic rationalisation of polity and economy. Moreover, he has done this (however tentatively) while presenting advanced capitalism as a framework of political and cultural instabilities, potentially crisis- and conflict-laden. It is thus that he has reconstructed Marxism as a critical sociology. However, he has not systematically addressed the problem of the relationship of a Marxist critical sociology to those societies that use a version of Marxism as their ‘ideology’ of legitimation. While it is not necessarily his task or that of his co-workers to produce a theory of the so-called socialist societies, it is nevertheless fair to ask if those approaches and concepts of his that have universal aspiration contribute to such a critical theory. For today most inherited Marxist theory, from Engels and Plekhanov to Lenin and Trotsky (and even Lukács, Gramsci and Sartre), is either powerless in the face of the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, or worse even contributes to their legitimation. In this essay I shall attempt to investigate the possible uses of Starnberg critical sociology for the study of these societies.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
J.Habermas, Theorie und Praxis (Neuwied: Luchterhand, 1967) pp. 161–3 [TP pp. 184–6].
K. Eder, ‘Zum Problem der logischen Periodisierung von Produktionsweisen’, in Theorien des Historischen Materialismus, ed. U. Jaeggi and H. Honneth (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1977) pp. 511, 520.
J. Habermas, ‘History and Evolution’, trans. D. J. Parent, Telos, 39 (Spring 1979 ) pp. 144, 148, 156.
C. Offe, ‘Crisis of Crisis Management’, International Journal of Politics, 6 (1976) p. 33.
E. Fraenkel, The Dual State ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1941 ).
Cf. essays in Interest Groups in Soviet Politics, ed. H. Skilling and F. Griffiths (Princeton University Press, 1971 ).
M. Vajda, ‘Is Kadarism an Alternative?’, Telos, 39 (Spring 1979 ).
R. Bauer, A. Inkeles and C. Kluckhohn, How the Soviet System Works ( New York: Knopf, 1956 ).
R. Dutschke, Versuch Lenin auf die Füsse zu Stellen ( Berlin: Wagenback, 1974 ).
F. Barghoorn, Soviet Russian Nationalism ( New York: Oxford University Press, 1956 ).
V. Zazlavksy, ‘The Problem of Legitimation in Soviet Society’, and ‘The Rebirth of the Stalin Cult in the USSR’, Telos, 40 (Summer 1979 ).
M. Cherniaysky, Tsar and People ( New Haven: Yale University Press, 1961 ).
Cf. Bauer, Inkeles and Kluckhohn, How the Soviet System Works; and R. Bauer and A. Inkeles, The Soviet Citizen ( Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1959 ).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1982 Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arato, A. (1982). Critical Sociology and Authoritarian State Socialism. In: Thompson, J.B., Held, D. (eds) Habermas. Contemporary Social Theory. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16763-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16763-0_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-27551-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16763-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)