Abstract
German political parties have hitherto been remarkably able to absorb protest movements on the Right and Left of the political spectrum. In recent years, however, there have appeared signs of a growing uneasiness with established parties and their ways. Intra-party conflict is increasing, or has at least become more visible than it was allowable in the past; so has intra-party dissent by backbench members of parliament.1 We have also witnessed a dramatic surge in the number of single-issue movements such as citizens’ initiative groups.2 Public opinion surveys show a steep decline in the sympathy ratings of parties from a peak reached between 1969 and 1971 to a record low after 1974.3 These findings seem to point to a widespread Parteiverdrossenheit, a grumbling disillusionment with party performance. Moreover, an increasing number of people, especially the young, think it right to engage in unconventional political behaviour such as lawful demonstrations, rent strikes, occupying buildings and blocking traffic, rather than just to participate in elections.4 Over and above this, new fringe groups such as the environmental ‘green’ groups have sprung up to compete with the parties in the electoral arena.5
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
For details, see Joachim Raschke, Organisierter Konflikt in westeuropäischen Parteien. Eine vergleichende Analyse parteiinterner Oppositionsgruppen (Opladen, 1977)
Bernd Guggenberger and Udo Kempf (eds), Bürgerinitiativen und repräsentatives System (Opladen, 1978). See also Jutta A. Helm, ‘Citizen Lobbies in West Germany’, in Peter H. Merkl (ed.), Western European Party Systems (New York, 1980) pp. 576–96.
The leading collection of essays is Bernd Guggenberger and Udo Kempf (eds), Bürgerinitiativen und repräsentatives System (Opladen, 1978). See also Jutta A. Helm, ‘Citizen Lobbies in West Germany’, in Peter H. Merkl (ed.), Western European Party Systems (New York, 1980) pp. 576–96.
See the diagram in Werner Kaltefleiter, ‘A Legitimacy Crisis of the German Party System?’, in Peter H. Merkl (ed.), op. cit., p. 602. For recent data, see the Emnid survey conducted for Der Spiegel: ‘“Es geht nur um die Stimmen”. Spiegel-Umfrage zur politischen Situation im Wahljahr 1980 (V): Zukunftssorgen und Verdrossenheit’, inDerSpiegel, 2 June 1980, pp. 48–53.
See the data in Samuel H. Barnes and Max Kaase (eds.), Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies (Beverly Hills and London, 1979) pp. 540 ff.
For details see Kurt Oeser, ‘Politische Strömungen in der Ökologiebewegung’, in Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (Beilage zur Wochenzeitung ‘Das Parlament 49 (1977) pp. 13–19.
For instance, see the report on the 1979 Congress of German Sociologists in Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 31 (1979), pp. 840 f. A broad tour d’horizon of the now much en vogue ‘crisis’ theme is given by Hermann Scheer, Parteien kontra Bürger? Die Zukunft der Parteiendemokratie (Munich and Zürich, 1979).
The point is made by Gordon Smith, Democracy in Western Germany. Parties and Politics in the Federal Republic (London, 1979), p. 77.
See also Richard Löwenthal, ‘Why German Stability is so Insecure’, in: Encounter (December, 1978) pp. 31–7 and Kurt Sontheimer, Die verunsicherte Republik. (Munich, 1979).
For details, Raschke, op. cit., passim.
As elucidated in Peter Haungs, ‘Über politische Parteien in westlichen Demokratien. Bemerkungen zur neueren Literatur’, in Haungs (ed.), Res Publica. Studien zum Verfassungswesen — Dolf Sternberger zum 70. Geburtstag (Munich, 1977) p. 151 f.
Karlheinz Niclauss, Demokratiegründung in Westdeutschland. Die Entstehung der Bundesrepublik 1945–1949 (Munich, 1974) pp. 73 ff.
M. Rainer Lepsius, ‘Soziale Ungleichheit und Klassenstrukturen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland’, in Hans-Ulrich Wehler (ed.), Klassen in der europäischen Sozialgeschichte (Gottingen, 1979) p. 176 f.
E. Spencer Wellhofer and Timothy M. Hennessey, ‘Models of Political Party Organisation and Strategy: Some Analytic Approaches to Oligarchy’, in Ivor Crewe (ed.), British Political Sociology Yearbook, 1 (London, 1974) p. 298.
Ibid., p. 310.
See Guenther Roth, The Social Democrats in Imperial Germany (Totowa, N. J., 1963, reprint, 1979) especially Ch. IX.
Wellhofer and Hennessey, op. cit., p. 310.
A critical assessment from a sympathetic point of view is Brian Barry, Sociologists, Economists and Democracy (London and Toronto, 1970), pp. 23 ff.;
for an interesting application of Olson’s theory to the development of trade unions in Britain, the United States and Germany, see Norbert Eickhof, Eine Theorie der Gewerkschaftsentwicklung. Entstehung, Stabilität und Befestigung (Tübingen, 1973).
Quoted in Wellhofer and Hennessey, op. cit., p. 300.
James Q. Wilson, Political Organisations (New York, 1973)
chapter 2. For an application of this typology to American party politics, see Kay Lawson, The Comparative Study of Political Parties (New York, 1976) pp. 95 and 113.
See Kenneth Dyson, Party, State and Bureaucracy in Western Germany (Beverly Hills and London, 1977) p. 43 and the tabulations in Klaus von Beyme, Das politische System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Eine Einführung (Munich, 1979) p. 72 f.
the tabulations in Klaus von Beyme, Das politische System der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Eine Einführung (Munich, 1979) p. 72 f.
Hermann Kaste and Joachim Raschke, ‘Zur Politik der Volkspartei’, reprinted in Wolf-Dieter Narr and Dietrich Tränhardt (eds.), Die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Entstehung, Entwicklung, Struktur (Neue Wissenschaftliche Bibliothek) (Meisenheim/Glan, 1979) pp. 168–209, especially pp. 185–9.
Steven B. Wolinetz, ‘The Transformation of Western European Party Systems Revisited’, in West European Politics (1979) pp. 4–28. For a differentiated discussion see Gordon Smith, Chapter 4 in this volume.
It rose from 20.6 per cent in 1950 to 43.7 per cent in 1976, as shown in Lepsius, op. cit., p. 169. See also the diagrams on these and a number of related data in Ursula Feist, Manfred Güllner and Klaus Liepelt, ‘Structural Assimilation Versus Ideological Polarisation: On Changing Profiles of Political Parties in West Germany’, in Max Kaase and Klaus von Beyme (eds.), Elections and Parties, German Political Studies, vol. 3 (Beverly Hills and London, 1978) pp. 171–89.
See, for example, the discussion in the SPD periodical Die Neue Gesellschaft (August 1979) especially pp. 678- 80. For a detailed analysis, Klaus Günther, Sozialdemokratie und Demokratie 1946–1966 (Bonn, 1979).
As carefully documented in Reinhard Schiffers, Elemente direkter Demokratie im Weimarer Regierungssystem (Düsseldorf, 1971).
A. J. and R. L. Merritt (eds), Public Opinion in Occupied Germany. The Omgus Survey, 1945–49 (Urbana, 1970), quoted in von Beyme, op. cit., p. 20.
David P. Conradt, The German Polity (New York and London, 1978) p. 55.
Gerhard Loewenberg, ‘The Development of the German Party System’, in K. H. Cerny (ed.), Germany at the Polls: The Bundestag Election of 1976 (Washington, 1978) p. 24.
Gabriel A. Almond and Sidney Verba, The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations (Princeton, 1963) pp. 225 ff., 250 ff., 428 f.
Conradt, op. cit., p. 51.
Almond and Verba, op. cit., p. 481.
Ibid., p. 487.
Ibid., p. 483.
For this attack, see the collection of essays in Charles A. McCoy and John Playford (eds), Apolitical Politics: A Critique of Behaviouralism (New York, 1967);
also Henry S. Kariel (ed.), Frontiers of Democratic Theory, (New York, 1970). For a reply, see Peter Y. Medding, “Elitist” Democracy: An Unsuccessful Critique of a Misunderstood Theory’, in Journal of Politics, 31 (1969) pp. 641–54 and Giovanni Sartori, ‘Anti-Elitism Revisited’, in: Government and Opposition (1978) pp. 58–80.
see Peter Y. Medding, “Elitist” Democracy: An Unsuccessful Critique of a Misunderstood Theory’, in Journal of Politics, 31 (1969) pp. 641–54 and Giovanni Sartori, ‘Anti-Elitism Revisited’, in: Government and Opposition (1978) pp. 58–80.
Giovanni Sartori, ‘Anti-Elitism Revisited’, in: Government and Opposition (1978) pp. 58–80.
Barry, op. cit., pp. 48–52.
Conradt, op. cit., p. 53 and passim draws on his article ‘Changing German Political Culture’, in Gabriel A. Almond and Sidney Verba (eds), The Civic Culture Revisited (Princeton, 1980).
With regard to anti-terrorist legislation, see the balanced statement by Wolfgang Krieger, ‘Worrying about West German Democracy’, in Political Quarterly, 50 (1979), pp. 192–204.
A point made by Wolfgang J. Mommsen, ‘“Wir sind wieder wer.” Wandlungen im politischen Selbstverständnis der Deutschen’, in Jürgen Habermas (ed.), Stichworte zur “Geistigen Situation der Zeit” (Frankfurt, 1979) p. 208.
See the sources in Beyme, op. cit., p. 39.
For the debate among British and German historians over the effects of Sammlungspolitik against the Social Democrats in Imperial Germany, see Richard J. Evans, ‘Wilhelm II’s Germany and the Historians’, in Evans (ed.), Society and Politics in Wilhelmine Germany (London, 1978) pp. 11–39
For the debate among British and German historians over the effects of Sammlungspolitik against the Social Democrats in Imperial Germany, see Richard J. Evans, ‘Wilhelm II’s Germany and the Historians’, in Evans (ed.), Society and Politics in Wilhelmine Germany (London, 1978) pp. 11–39 and Volker R. Berghahn, ‘Politik und Gesellschaft im Wilhelminischen Deutschland’, in Neue Politische Literatur, 1979, pp. 164–95.
For a detailed analysis, see Dieter Grosser, Vom monarchischen Konstitutionalismus zur parlamentarischen Demokratie. Die Verfassungspolitik der deutschen Parteien im letzten Jahrzehnt des Kaiserreichs (The Hague, 1970) pp. 60 ff. and 163 ff.
For evidence, see Hans Fenske, Wahlrecht und Parteiensystem. Ein Beitrag zur deutschen Parteiengeschichte (Frankfurt, 1972) pp. 342 ff.
Peter Pulzer, ‘Responsible Party Government and Stable Coalition: The Case of the German Federal Republic’, in Political Studies, 26 (1978) p. 185.
Frederick C. Engelmann, ‘Perceptions of the Great Coalition in West Germany, 1966–1969’, in Canadian Journal of Political Science, 5 (1972) p. 37 f.
Ekkehart Krippendorff, Das Ende des Parteienstaates?’, in Der Monat, 14 (1962) pp. 64 ff.
For instance, see S. M. Lipset and S. Rokkan, ‘Preface’, in Otto Stammer (ed.), Party Systems, Party Organisations, and the Politics of the New Masses (Berlin, 1968) mimeo.
Friedrich H. Tenbruck, ‘Deutsche Soziologie im internationalen Kontext’, in Günther Lüschen (ed.), Deutsche Soziologie seit 1945. Entwicklungsrichtung und Praxisbezug, Sonderheft 21/1979 of the Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, p. 74.
Hugh Seton-Watson, Thoughts on Intellectuals and Intelligentsias’ (Paper at the Seminar ‘Intellectuals and Social Change in Europe’, University of London, School of Slavonic and East European Studies).
Engelmann, op. cit., p. 54.
Bodo Zeuner, ‘Das Parteiensystem in der Grossen Koalition’, in Dietrich Staritz (ed.), Das Parteiensystem der Bundesrepublik. Geschichte — Entstehung — Entwicklung (Opladen, 1976) p. 193.
Helmut Norpoth, ‘Choosing A Coalition Partner: Mass Preferences and Elite Decisions in West Germany’, in Comparative Political Studies, 12 (1980) pp. 424–40; quote on p. 437.
See Feist et al., op. cit., p. 182 f.
For details, see Manfred G. Schmidt, ‘Die “Politik der inneren Reformen” in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1969–1976’, in Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 19 (1978) pp. 201–53.
See the arguments of M. Rainer Lepsius, Wahlverhalten, Parteien und politische Spannungen’, in Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 14 (1973) pp. 295–313, especially pp. 308 ff.
Rudolf Wildenmann, ‘Germany 1930/1970: The Empirical Findings’, in Wildenmann (ed.), Sozialwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch für Politik, 2 (1971) p. 57 f.
Pulzer, op. cit., p. 195 f. Manfred Küchler, ‘What has Electoral Sociology in West Germany Achieved? A Critical Review’, in Kaase and von Beyme (eds.), op. cit., p. 27 points to the heart of the matter: ‘With the clear election victory of the Social—Liberal Coalition a constellation came into being which was completely new in German history. This made it necessary to answer the question of whether 1972 was a normal election with a short-term interference factor or rather a ‘critical election’, i.e. the starting-point for a long-term reorientation of relatively broad strata of the electorate.’
For details, see Schmidt, op. cit., pp. 215–21.
Kaste and Raschke, op. cit., p. 197.
Ronald Inglehart, The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics (Princeton, 1978) p. 27 ff.
Ibid., p. 38.
See Table 10.4 in Chapter 10, by Pappi and Terwey, in this volume.
On the basis of survey data, this supposition is made by Max Kaase and Hans Klingemann, ‘Sozialstruktur, Wertorientierung und Parteiensysteme: Zum Problem der Interessenvermittlung in westlichen Demokratien’, in Joachim Matthes (ed.), Sozialer Wandel in Westeuropa. Verhandlungen des 19. Deutschen Soziologentages 1979 (Frankfurt and New York, 1979) pp. 535 and 568. Their prediction is aptly illustrated by recent conflicts in North Rhine-Westphalia, see Der Spiegel, 4 February 1980, pp. 43–5.
See the revealing results of a study which interviewed a panel of newly elected members of the Bundestag over time, Bernhard Badura and Jurgen Reese, Jungparlamentarier in Bonn — ihre Sozialisation im Deutschen Bundestag (Stuttgart, 1976).
See survey data quoted by Gerhard Schmidtchen, ‘Ist Legitimitat messbar? in Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 8 (1977) p. 238 f.
Conradt, op. cit., p. 56. See also M. and S. Greiffenhagen, Ein schwieriges Vaterland: Zur politischen Kultur Deutschlands, (Munich, 1978).
Recent data in the Emnid survey of 1980, published in Der Spiegel, 2 June 1980, p. 51.
See Heino Kaack, Geschichte und Struktur des deutschen Parteiensystem (Opladen, 1971) p. 498 ff.
See Heino Kaack, Geschichte und Struktur des deutschen Parteiensystem (Opladen, 1971) p. 498 ff.
For this argument, see also Wolfgang Jager, ‘Bürgerinitiativen -Verbände — Parteien. Thesen zu einer funktionalen Analyse’, in Guggenberger and Kempf (eds.), op. cit., p. 218 f.
For estimates of the number of members, see Udo Kempf, ‘Burgerinitiativen — Der empirische Befund’, in ibid., p. 359. For the normal duration, see ibid., p. 366. Compare also Helm, op. cit., p. 577 f.
See the breakdown in Kempf, op. cit., p. 361.
James Q. Wilson, The Amateur Democrat: Club Politics in Three Cities (Chicago, 1962) pp. 3, 13, 19 and passim.
For instance, see Michael Th. Greven, ‘Parteiensystem, Wertwandel und neue Marginalitat’, in Matthes (ed.), op. cit., p. 581 f.
Max Kaase, ‘The Crisis of Authority in Western Liberal Democracies: Myth and Reality’, in Richard Rose (ed.), Challenge to Governance (London, 1979).
Kaase and Klingemann, op. cit., pp. 556 and 566 f.
Alan Ware, ‘Competition, Oligopoly and Electoral Markets’, in Ware, The Logic of Party Democracy (London, 1979) pp. 32–52 and 46 f.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1982 Herbert Döring and Gordon Smith
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Döring, H. (1982). A Crisis of the Party System? — An Assessment. In: Döring, H., Smith, G. (eds) Party Government and Political Culture in Western Germany. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16713-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16713-5_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-16715-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16713-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)