Skip to main content
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

Experimentally we know that if we apply a voltage V across the ends of a body of constant cross section, the current (I) is proportional to the applied voltage (V), so that

$$V=RI\quad or\quad R=V/I$$
(2.1)

where R is the constant of the proportionality and is called the resistance of the body. We also know that for a given material the resistance is proportional to its length and inversely proportional to the cross sectional area so that

$$R=\rho L/A\quad or\quad \rho =R.A/L$$
(2.2)

where ρ is called the resistivity of the material and is the resistance of a cube with a side of unit length. The units of resistivity are usually given as ohm — meters (Ω−m) or, more pedantically, Ω−m2/m; this latter system follows from the dimensions of the right hand side of equation 2.2. The formal definition of resistivity is that it is the ratio of the voltage gradient to the current density over a small thin surface element of the medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Suggestions for Further Reading

  • Bhattacharya, P.K. and Patra, H.P., 1968. Direct current geoelectric sounding, Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, G.V. and Frischknecht, F.C., 1966. Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting, Pergamon, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orellana, E. and Mooney, H.M., 1966. Master tables and curves for vertical electrical sounding over layered structures, Interciencia, Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. and Apparao, A., 1971. Depth of investigation in direct current methods, Geophysics, 36, 943–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saydam, A.S. and Duckworth, K., 1978. Comparison of some electrode arrays for their IP and apparent resistivity responses over a sheet like target, Geoexploration, 16, 267–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tagg, G.F., 1934. Interpretations of resistivity measurements, Trans. A.I.M.M.E., 110, 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Nostrand, R.F. and Cook, K.L., 1966. Interpretation of resistivity data, U.S.G.S. Professional paper 499, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1981 A. E. Beck

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beck, A.E. (1981). Electrical methods. In: Physical Principles of Exploration Methods. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16605-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics