Abstract
Earlier, it was suggested that the psychometric movement can be seen as responding to an interrelated group of problems concerning race and empire, industry and human efficiency. Before 1914, British psychometrics had scarcely touched the second part of this problematic, although on the eve of the First World War Münsterberg’s classic text Psychology and Industrial Efficiency became available. The war proved decisive in the development of applied psychology, because of both the immediate needs of the ‘warfare’ state and the longer-term effects of the war on capitalism. In all the belligerent countries, the war brought into being a powerful industrial-military complex charged with expediting production, most commonly by the use of machine-tool technology and ‘flow’ techniques, and securing the maximum efficiency of labour. In Britain, this complex was centred on the war-time Ministry of Munitions whose officers spread the gospel of scientific management, recruited scientific, professional and business expertise to the service of the state and enforced the ‘dilution’ of labour (that is the more frugal use of skill in production).
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
C. S. Myers, Industrial Psychology in Britain ( London: Jonathan Cape, 1926 ) pp. 114–115.
F. W. Lawe, ‘The Economic Aspects of Industrial Psychology’, in C. S. Myers (ed.), Industrial Psychology ( London: Thorton Butterworth, 1929 ) p. 219.
T. H. Pear, ‘C. S. Myers’,British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 17, pt 1 (Feb 1947).
See E. P. Allen Hunt and Percival Smith, The Teachers’ Guide to Intelligence and other psychological testing ( London: Evans, 1935 ) pp. 1–9.
A. G. Hughes and E. H. Hughes, Learning and Teaching (London: Longman, 1937 ) pp. 64, 71.
C. Burt, ‘The Mental Differences between Individuals’, Presidential Address to Section J of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, (1923).
J. L. Gray and P. Moshinsky, ‘Ability and Opportunity in English Education’, in Lancelot Hogben (ed.), Political Arithmetic (London: Allen & Unwin, 1938.
J. W. B. Douglas, The Home and the School (London: MacGibbon &Kee, 1964 ).
E. P. Allen Hunt and P. Smith, The Teachers‘ Guide to Intelligence and other psychological testing ( London: Evans, 1935 ) p. 9.
Board of Education, Supplementary Memorandum on Examinations for Scholarships and Special Places in Secondary Schools ( London: HMSO, 1936 ).
Board of Education, Report of the Consultative Committee on the Primary School ( London: HMSO, 1931 ) p. 131.
Percy Nunn, ‘Psychology and Education’,Briti.shJournal ofPsycholoy vol. 10 (Mar 1920).
See J. Floud, A. H. Halsey and F. M. Martin, Social Class and Educational Opportunity ( London: Heinemann, 1957 ) p. 131.
See G. Thomson, Instinct, Intelligence and Character (London: Allen & Unwin, 1924 ) pp. 220–1.
NUT, Transfer from Primary to Secondary Schools ( London: Evans, 1949 ) pp. 57–9.
Wm. McClelland, Selection for Secondary Education (University of London Press, 1942) p. 77.
C. Burt, ‘Ability and Income’,British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 13 (June 1943) p. 83.
L. Kamin, The Science and Politics of IQ (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1974; Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977) pp. 55–6.
L. S. Hearnshaw, Cyril Burt: Psychologist London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1979 p. 141.
C. Burt, ‘An Inquiry into Public Opinion Regarding Educational Reforms’, in two parts, see Occupational Psychology, vol. 17, no. 4 (Oct 1943) and vol. 18, no. 1 (Jan 1944).
C. Burt, ‘The Education of the Young Adolescent: the Psychological Implications of the Norwood Report’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 13 (1943) p. 131.
W. J. Campbell, ‘The Influence of Home Environment on Educational Progress’, British Journal of Educational Psychology vol. 22 (1952) p. 101. (This piece of research was clearly inspired by Burt’s remarks.)
Robin Pedley, The Comprehensive School ( Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1963 ) p. 43.
Cited in Willem van der Eyken (ed.), Education, the Child and Society (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973) pp. 454, 459.
C. Burt, ‘The Mental Differences between Children’, C. B. Cox and A. E. Dyson (eds), Black Paper Two: The Crisis in Education (1969) p. 16.
A. R. Jensen, ‘The Current status of the IQ controversy’, The Australian Psychologist, vol. 13, no. 1 (1978).
C. Burt, ‘Is Intelligence Distributed Normally?’, British Journal of Statistical Psychology, vol. 16 (1963) pp. 175–190.
A. R. Jensen, ‘The Nature of Intelligence and its Relations with Learning’, Melbourne Studies on Education (Melbourne University Press, 1978 ).
P. Vernon,Intelligence and Cultural Environment (London: Methuen, 1969) given in H. Butcher and D. Lomax (eds) Readings in Human Intelligence(London: Methuen, 1972) pp. 354, 359.
Copyright information
© 1981 Brian Evans and Bernard Waites
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Evans, B., Waites, B. (1981). Mental Testing and Society — II: Individual Psychology, Industry and Education. In: IQ and Mental Testing. Critical Social Studies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16577-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16577-3_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-25649-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16577-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)