Skip to main content

Mental Testing and Society — II: Individual Psychology, Industry and Education

  • Chapter
IQ and Mental Testing

Part of the book series: Critical Social Studies

Abstract

Earlier, it was suggested that the psychometric movement can be seen as responding to an interrelated group of problems concerning race and empire, industry and human efficiency. Before 1914, British psychometrics had scarcely touched the second part of this problematic, although on the eve of the First World War Münsterberg’s classic text Psychology and Industrial Efficiency became available. The war proved decisive in the development of applied psychology, because of both the immediate needs of the ‘warfare’ state and the longer-term effects of the war on capitalism. In all the belligerent countries, the war brought into being a powerful industrial-military complex charged with expediting production, most commonly by the use of machine-tool technology and ‘flow’ techniques, and securing the maximum efficiency of labour. In Britain, this complex was centred on the war-time Ministry of Munitions whose officers spread the gospel of scientific management, recruited scientific, professional and business expertise to the service of the state and enforced the ‘dilution’ of labour (that is the more frugal use of skill in production).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. C. S. Myers, Industrial Psychology in Britain ( London: Jonathan Cape, 1926 ) pp. 114–115.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. W. Lawe, ‘The Economic Aspects of Industrial Psychology’, in C. S. Myers (ed.), Industrial Psychology ( London: Thorton Butterworth, 1929 ) p. 219.

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. H. Pear, ‘C. S. Myers’,British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 17, pt 1 (Feb 1947).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. See E. P. Allen Hunt and Percival Smith, The Teachers’ Guide to Intelligence and other psychological testing ( London: Evans, 1935 ) pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. G. Hughes and E. H. Hughes, Learning and Teaching (London: Longman, 1937 ) pp. 64, 71.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Burt, ‘The Mental Differences between Individuals’, Presidential Address to Section J of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, (1923).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. L. Gray and P. Moshinsky, ‘Ability and Opportunity in English Education’, in Lancelot Hogben (ed.), Political Arithmetic (London: Allen & Unwin, 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. W. B. Douglas, The Home and the School (London: MacGibbon &Kee, 1964 ).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. P. Allen Hunt and P. Smith, The Teachers‘ Guide to Intelligence and other psychological testing ( London: Evans, 1935 ) p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Board of Education, Supplementary Memorandum on Examinations for Scholarships and Special Places in Secondary Schools ( London: HMSO, 1936 ).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Board of Education, Report of the Consultative Committee on the Primary School ( London: HMSO, 1931 ) p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Percy Nunn, ‘Psychology and Education’,Briti.shJournal ofPsycholoy vol. 10 (Mar 1920).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See J. Floud, A. H. Halsey and F. M. Martin, Social Class and Educational Opportunity ( London: Heinemann, 1957 ) p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  14. See G. Thomson, Instinct, Intelligence and Character (London: Allen & Unwin, 1924 ) pp. 220–1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. NUT, Transfer from Primary to Secondary Schools ( London: Evans, 1949 ) pp. 57–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wm. McClelland, Selection for Secondary Education (University of London Press, 1942) p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Burt, ‘Ability and Income’,British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 13 (June 1943) p. 83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. L. Kamin, The Science and Politics of IQ (New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1974; Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1977) pp. 55–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. L. S. Hearnshaw, Cyril Burt: Psychologist London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1979 p. 141.

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Burt, ‘An Inquiry into Public Opinion Regarding Educational Reforms’, in two parts, see Occupational Psychology, vol. 17, no. 4 (Oct 1943) and vol. 18, no. 1 (Jan 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Burt, ‘The Education of the Young Adolescent: the Psychological Implications of the Norwood Report’, British Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 13 (1943) p. 131.

    Google Scholar 

  22. W. J. Campbell, ‘The Influence of Home Environment on Educational Progress’, British Journal of Educational Psychology vol. 22 (1952) p. 101. (This piece of research was clearly inspired by Burt’s remarks.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Robin Pedley, The Comprehensive School ( Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1963 ) p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cited in Willem van der Eyken (ed.), Education, the Child and Society (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973) pp. 454, 459.

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. Burt, ‘The Mental Differences between Children’, C. B. Cox and A. E. Dyson (eds), Black Paper Two: The Crisis in Education (1969) p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. R. Jensen, ‘The Current status of the IQ controversy’, The Australian Psychologist, vol. 13, no. 1 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  27. C. Burt, ‘Is Intelligence Distributed Normally?’, British Journal of Statistical Psychology, vol. 16 (1963) pp. 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. A. R. Jensen, ‘The Nature of Intelligence and its Relations with Learning’, Melbourne Studies on Education (Melbourne University Press, 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Vernon,Intelligence and Cultural Environment (London: Methuen, 1969) given in H. Butcher and D. Lomax (eds) Readings in Human Intelligence(London: Methuen, 1972) pp. 354, 359.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1981 Brian Evans and Bernard Waites

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evans, B., Waites, B. (1981). Mental Testing and Society — II: Individual Psychology, Industry and Education. In: IQ and Mental Testing. Critical Social Studies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16577-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics