Skip to main content

Some Observations on Economic Theory and Technical Change

  • Chapter
The Relevance of Economic Theories

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Publications ((IEA))

  • 30 Accesses

Abstract

The question of the relevance of economic theory to present-day society is particularly important when we come to the issues surrounding changes in technology. However loosely we define technical change (say, as changes in methods or processes of production as well as in the products themselves), the fact that it affects every aspect of social life undoubtedly justifies a close examination of the way in which economic theory tries to grasp this very complex phenomenon.

The authors wish to acknowledge the comments received on earlier versions of this paper from G. K. Boon, Raúl Conde, Pierre Ewenczyk, Eduardo A. Guimarães, Patrick Maurisson, Alfonso Mercado, Carlos Roces and José Tavares. They have also benefited from the discussion at the round table.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See for example, W. E. G. Salter, Productivity and Technical Change (Cambridge University Press, 1960);

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. A. Samuelson, ‘A Theory of Induced Innovation along Kennedy-Weisacker Lines’, Review of Economics and Statistics (November 1965);

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Rosenberg, Perspectives on Technology (Cambridge University Press, 1976). p. 63.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Michael Polanyi, ‘The Republic of Science: its Political and Economic Theory’, in E. Shils (ed.), Criteria for Scientific Development (MIT Press, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  5. See for example, G. J. Stigler, ‘Perfect Competition Historically Contemplated’, in E. Mansfield (ed.), Microeconomics: Selected Readings (New York, Norton, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See the developments and criticisms to these studies in J. Tavares, (ed.), Difusão do Inovagoes na Industria Brasileira, Rio de Janeiro (IPEA/INPES, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Mansfield, Intrafirm Rates of Diffusion of an Innovation’, Review of Economics and Statistics (November 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Sylos Labini, Oligopoly and Technical Progress (Harvard University Press, 1969);

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Steindl, Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism, 2nd. edn. (Monthly Review Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Pasinetti, ‘Le Choix des Techniques et les Theoriés du Capital, des Prix et de la Répartition du Revenu’, Revue d’Economie Politique (March-April, 1977). (Our translation.)

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. M. Solow, ‘A Contribution to the Theory of Growth’, in A. K. Sen (ed.), Growth Economics (Penguin Books, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Robinson, ‘Capital Theory Up to Date’, in E. K. Hunt and J. Schwartz (eds.), A Critique of Economic Theory (Penguin Books, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  13. See C. Benetti, Valeur et Répartition (Presses Universitaires de GrenobleEds. Maspero, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. For a comprehensive review of the controversy see G. C. Harcourt’s account in Some Cambridge Controversies in the Theory of Capital (Cambridge University Press, 1972).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Dobb, Theories of Value and Distribution since Adam Smith (Cambridge University Press, 1973), p. 256.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Medio, ‘Néoclassiques, Néoricardiens et Marx’, in G. Faccarello and P. de Lavergne (eds.), Une Nouvelle Approche en Economie Politique (Paris, Economica, 1977). (Our translation.)

    Google Scholar 

  17. This is essentially the criticism addressed to C. E. Ferguson’s The Neoclassical Theory of Production and Distribution (Cambridge University Press, 1969), by Joan Robinson in her article quoted in footnote 1 on p. 245.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. J. Schmookler, Invention and Economic Growth (Harvard University Press, 1966).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. C. Vaitsos, Intercountry Income Distribution and Transnational Enterprises (Oxford University Press, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. Fajnzylber, ‘Oligopolio, Empresas Transnacionales y Estilos de Desarrollo’, El Trimestre Econômico (July-September 1976).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jozef Pajestka C. H. Feinstein

Copyright information

© 1980 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Urquidi, V.L., Nadal, A. (1980). Some Observations on Economic Theory and Technical Change. In: Pajestka, J., Feinstein, C.H. (eds) The Relevance of Economic Theories. International Economic Association Publications. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16443-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics