Abstract
I interpret my task as being to survey development theory critically, in the light of its realism and relevance to the problems of development, to discuss the case for interdisciplinary studies, to separate ideas that have been discarded from those that have withstood the test of time and to point to promising new departures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. O. Hirschman, Exit, Voice and Loyalty (Harvard, 1970).
See H. Leibenstein, Economic Backwardness and Economic Growth (John Wiley, New York, 1963).
See G. Myrdal, An American Dilemma (Harper, New York, 1944).
An important attempt to discover which variables and interactions may be appropriate under which circumstances is to be found in I. Adelman and C. T. Morris, Society, Politics and Economic Development (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1967).
As Voltaire said, an incantation will destroy a flock of sheep if it is accompanied by a sufficient dose of arsenic’, A. Marshall, Official Papers (Macmillan, London, 1926), p. 40.
J. M. Keynes, ‘Economic Possibilities for our Grand-Children’. Reprinted in Essays in Persuasion (Macmillan, London, 1931), p. 373.
See W. Arthur Lewis, The Evolution of the International Economic Order (Princeton, 1977).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1980 International Economic Association
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Streeten, P. (1980). Development: What have we Learned?. In: Pajestka, J., Feinstein, C.H. (eds) The Relevance of Economic Theories. International Economic Association Publications. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16443-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16443-1_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-16445-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16443-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)