Skip to main content
  • 16 Accesses

Abstract

In this portion of the study attention turns to the precise mechanisms by which the prohibitions proclaimed on the paper of the statute are given effective force. It is here that the distinctively legal controls on discrimination operate in their unique environment. There are of course other means by which discrimination might conceivably be reduced. Market forces might make it uneconomic for employers to cut themselves off from the supply of black labour, or for vendors of houses to restrict their pool of potential purchasers. Given the high level of unemployment, and brisk demand for good housing, reliance on the market would only exceptionally be an effective strategy; indeed even with nearly full employment in the 1960s, blacks were largely restricted to the least desirable jobs and encountered massive discrimination in other aspects of life.1 Other factors, notably the attenuated influence of market considerations in vital matters such as the provision of council housing and public sector employment, and the influence of collective bargaining, make the strategy even less plausible in present-day Britain. Alternatively, it might be argued that education and exhortation are the appropriate means of altering discriminatory behaviour, a tactic that would require no legal mechanisms at all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Documented fully in the 1967 PEP Report, published in popular form as W. Daniel, Racial Discrimination in England (Penguin Books, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a convenient summary and review of this literature see Miers and Veitch, ‘Assault on the Law of Tort’, (1975) 38 M.L.R. 139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. See also P. Atiyah, Accidents, Compensation and the Law (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2nd edn, 1975) parts 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. As indicated in the Preface, I reject the ‘pacification’ theory of racial discrimination legislation in Britain. Nor do theories of ‘symbolic’ legislation, such as the interpretation of Prohibition laws in the United States in J. Gusfield, Symbolic Crusade (University of Illinois Press, 1963), pertain here.

    Google Scholar 

  5. On which see B. Weekes et al., Industrial Relations and the Limits of Law (Blackwell, 1975) chap. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See, e.g., M. Sovern, Legal Restraints on Racial Discrimination in Employment (Twentieth Century Fund, 1966) chap. 3

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tarnopolsky, ‘The Iron Hand in the Velvet Glove’, 46 Can. B. Rev. 565, 568–72 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  8. The analysis of this question offered in chap. 12 is deeply influenced by the late Sir Otto Kahn-Freund’s lecture, ‘On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law’, (1974) 37 M.L.R. 1, reprinted as chap. 12 in his Selected Writings (Stevens, 1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. See also A. Watson, Legal Transplants (Scottish Academic Press, 1974), which is concerned only with rules of private law.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1980 Laurence Lustgarten

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lustgarten, L. (1980). Introduction. In: Legal Control of Racial Discrimination. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16439-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics