Abstract
In this portion of the study attention turns to the precise mechanisms by which the prohibitions proclaimed on the paper of the statute are given effective force. It is here that the distinctively legal controls on discrimination operate in their unique environment. There are of course other means by which discrimination might conceivably be reduced. Market forces might make it uneconomic for employers to cut themselves off from the supply of black labour, or for vendors of houses to restrict their pool of potential purchasers. Given the high level of unemployment, and brisk demand for good housing, reliance on the market would only exceptionally be an effective strategy; indeed even with nearly full employment in the 1960s, blacks were largely restricted to the least desirable jobs and encountered massive discrimination in other aspects of life.1 Other factors, notably the attenuated influence of market considerations in vital matters such as the provision of council housing and public sector employment, and the influence of collective bargaining, make the strategy even less plausible in present-day Britain. Alternatively, it might be argued that education and exhortation are the appropriate means of altering discriminatory behaviour, a tactic that would require no legal mechanisms at all.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Documented fully in the 1967 PEP Report, published in popular form as W. Daniel, Racial Discrimination in England (Penguin Books, 1968).
For a convenient summary and review of this literature see Miers and Veitch, ‘Assault on the Law of Tort’, (1975) 38 M.L.R. 139.
See also P. Atiyah, Accidents, Compensation and the Law (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2nd edn, 1975) parts 1–3.
As indicated in the Preface, I reject the ‘pacification’ theory of racial discrimination legislation in Britain. Nor do theories of ‘symbolic’ legislation, such as the interpretation of Prohibition laws in the United States in J. Gusfield, Symbolic Crusade (University of Illinois Press, 1963), pertain here.
On which see B. Weekes et al., Industrial Relations and the Limits of Law (Blackwell, 1975) chap. 7.
See, e.g., M. Sovern, Legal Restraints on Racial Discrimination in Employment (Twentieth Century Fund, 1966) chap. 3
Tarnopolsky, ‘The Iron Hand in the Velvet Glove’, 46 Can. B. Rev. 565, 568–72 (1968).
The analysis of this question offered in chap. 12 is deeply influenced by the late Sir Otto Kahn-Freund’s lecture, ‘On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law’, (1974) 37 M.L.R. 1, reprinted as chap. 12 in his Selected Writings (Stevens, 1978).
See also A. Watson, Legal Transplants (Scottish Academic Press, 1974), which is concerned only with rules of private law.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1980 Laurence Lustgarten
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lustgarten, L. (1980). Introduction. In: Legal Control of Racial Discrimination. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16439-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16439-4_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-24388-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16439-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)