Skip to main content

Ideology and the Practice of Sound Editing and Mixing

  • Chapter
The Cinematic Apparatus

Abstract

The practices of sound editing and mixing to be considered here are those developed within the Hollywood studio system. ‘System’, should be understood in a rigorous sense as necessitating a certain amount of standardisation (with respect to techniques and machinery) and a relatively strict division of labour. Nevertheless, these practices have become ‘normalised’ to a large extent outside of that system — they have had enormous impact on the film-making industries of other countries, for instance, and on independent filmmaking activities as well. My assumption is that not only techniques of sound-track construction but the language of technicians and the discourses on technique are symptomatic of particular ideological aims.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Michel Marie, ‘Son’, in Jean Collet et al., Lectures du film (Paris: Albatros, 1975), p. 206.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roland Barthes, Mythologies (London: Cape, and New York: Hill and Wang, 1972), p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ernest Walter, The Technique of the Film Cutting Room (New York: Focal Press, 1973), p. 2I2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Walter Murch in an interview by Larry Sturhahn, ‘The art of the sound editor: an interview with Walter Murch’, Filmmakers Newsletter vol. VIII no. 2 (December 1974), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Helen Van Dongen, quoted in Karel Reisz, The Technique of Film Editing (London and New York: Focal Press, 1964), p. 155.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carl Dreher, ‘Recording, re-recording, and editing of sound’, Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers vol. XVI no. 6 (June 1931), p. 763.

    Google Scholar 

  7. John L. Cass, ‘The illusion of sound and picture’, Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers vol. XIV no. 3 (March 1930), p. 325.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Joe W. Coffman, ‘Art and science in sound film production’, Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers vol. XIV no. 2 (February 1930), pp. 173–4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. James R. Cameron, Sound Motion Pictures (Coral Gables: Cameron Publishing Company, 1959), p. 365.

    Google Scholar 

  10. George Lewin, ‘Dubbing and its relation to sound picture production’, Journal of the Society of Motion Picture Engineers vol. XVI no. 1 (January 1931), p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Teresa de Lauretis Stephen Heath

Copyright information

© 1980 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited and Teresa de Lauretis and Stephen Heath

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doane, M.A. (1980). Ideology and the Practice of Sound Editing and Mixing. In: de Lauretis, T., Heath, S. (eds) The Cinematic Apparatus. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16401-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics