Abstract
The previous chapters have had two aims: to shed light on the plays being discussed and to assess the kind of help to be had from some of the major critical approaches. Underlying both aims has been the attempt to discover the source of Shakespeare’s seeming inexhaustibility. It is time now to draw together the threads of these lines of investigation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
John Ruskin, Modern Painters, vol. IV (1856) p. 377.
D. H. Lawrence, ‘Thought’, Collected Poems, ed. V. de Sola Pinto and F. Warren Roberts, vol. 11 (1964) p. 673.
D. J. Enright, ‘Coriolanus: Tragedy or Debate?’, Essays in Criticism, IV (1954) p. 19.
Copyright information
© 1980 Raymond Powell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Powell, R. (1980). Conclusion. In: Shakespeare and the Critics’ Debate. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16362-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16362-5_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-27667-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16362-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)