Skip to main content

Influences Contributing to Differences in Control Practices Between Countries

  • Chapter
Top Management Control in Europe
  • 31 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter and the next one bring in explanations of the described detailed management control practices and conclude with propositions. Clearly the data show some overlapping in practices between countries although differences are quite sharp. ‘Cultural explanations’ are thus important but not sufficient. The close relationship seen between planning structure and control, for instance, shows that resorting only to country factors for explanation will not be enough. The next chapter will bring in both impacts on selected features of control, while this one focuses on country factors only, as it draws on second­ary sources only. A summary of the findings across countries is first presented. The central question answered in this chapter is: ‘What lies behind the observed differences in control practices by country?’ What plausible explanations may be advanced to account for these differences? The discussion draws heavily on secondary sources and is consequently frankly speculative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 14.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. M. Ivens, ‘Behind the Organization Man’, Twentieth Century, vol. 17, no. 3 (Spring 1965) pp. 21–2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Granick, The European Executive (New York: Doubleday, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Haire, E. E. Ghiselli and L. W. Porter, Managerial Thinking (New York: John Wiley, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. C. Wallich, Mainsprings of the German Revival (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1955), p. 333.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Harbison and C. A. Myers, Management in the Industrial World (New York: McGraw Hill, 1959) p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Grosset, Management, European and American Styles (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. D. Weinschall, ‘Communication, Culture and the Education of Multinational Managers’, in T. D. Weinschall (ed.), Culture and Management (Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguing Books, 1977) p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michel Crozier, The Bureaucratic Phenomenon (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  9. See for instance Francois Bourricaud, ‘Sociologie du Chef d’Entreprise: le Jeune Patron’, Revue Economique, vol. 6 (November 1958), pp. 896–911.

    Google Scholar 

  10. I7. See for instance J. R. Pitts, ‘The Bourgeois Family and French Economic Retardation’, PhD thesis (Boston: Harvard University, 1957);

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. X. Trepo, ‘The Introduction of Management by Objectives in France: Reality of Ritual?’ Doctoral thesis (Boston: Harvard Business School, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1980 Jacques Henri Horovitz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Horovitz, J.H. (1980). Influences Contributing to Differences in Control Practices Between Countries. In: Top Management Control in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16357-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics