The Transition from Exhaustible to Renewable or Inexhaustible Resources

  • Tjalling C. Koopmans
Part of the International Economic Association Publications Series book series (IEA)


Allow me to begin with some simple and rather obvious remarks on the nature of the transition problem from exhaustible to renewable or inexhaustible resource use. First, a shift in resource use means also a shift in technology, because in this age resources go together with technologies that process them and put them to use. Secondly, while I have used the word ‘exhaustible’, the term ‘depletion’ is a more suitable word, in that it suggests a more gradual process. The later stages of depletion will then whenever possible call forth a substitute resource that allows society to meet the same or a similar need to that met by the resource being depleted. Finally, I will follow the model of price as a regulator that will touch off the substitution, smoothly if the degree and rate of depletion are foreseen sufficiently in advance.


Capital Stock Transition Problem Resource Flow Exhaustible Resource Vector Path 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnett, H. J. and C. Morse, Scarcity and Growth (Johns Hopkins Press, 1963).Google Scholar
  2. Dasgupta, P. and G. Heal, ‘The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources’, Rev. of Econ. Stud., Symposium (1974), 3–28.Google Scholar
  3. Goeller, H. E. and A. M. Weinberg, ‘The Age of Substitutability,’ Science (20 Feb 1976), 683–9.Google Scholar
  4. Hoffman, K. and E. Cherniaysky, ‘A Model for Interfuel Substitution and Technological Change’, (Brookhaven Nat. Lab., June 1974).Google Scholar
  5. Hotelling, H., ‘The Economics of Exhaustible Resources’, Jn. of Pol. Econ. 39 (April 1931), 137–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Manne, A. S., ‘Waiting for the Breeder’, Rev. Econ. Stud., Symposium (1974) 47–66.Google Scholar
  7. Manne, A. S., ‘ETA: A Model for Technology Assessment’, Bell Jn. of Econ. (Autumn, 1976), 379–406.Google Scholar
  8. Marcuse, W. et al., ‘A Dynamic Time Dependent Model for the Analysis of Alternative Energy Policies’, BNL-19406 (Brookhaven Nat. Lab., July 1975).Google Scholar
  9. Nordhaus, W. D., ‘The Allocation of Energy Resources’, Brookings Papers, (1973), 4, 429–570.Google Scholar
  10. Nordhaus, W. D., ‘The Demand for Energy: An International Perspective’, in Nordhaus (Ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Energy Demand, CP-76-1, Int’l Inst. for Appl. Syst. An., Austria (1976), 511–87.Google Scholar
  11. Ramsey, F. R., ‘A Mathematical Theory of Savings’, Econ. Jn. (Dec. 1928), 543–59.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Economic Association 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tjalling C. Koopmans
    • 1
  1. 1.Yale UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations