Skip to main content

Alienation from Hegel to Marx

  • Chapter
  • 72 Accesses

Part of the book series: Critical Social Studies ((CSOCS))

Abstract

One of the pivotal issues between Critical and Scientific Marxists is the importance of “alienation” in the work of the mature Marx, and whether or not, as Scientific Marxists often believe, it was an Hegelian vestige that lost significance in his later work. Within Marx’s own tradition, the notion of alienation derives most immediately from Feuerbach and Hegel. The roots of Marx’s critique of alienation may be found, as Georg Lukàcs found them, in Hegel’s Protestantizing critique of “positivity.”1 In this critique, Hegel rejects as “dead” those human relationships or institutions in which persons give only an outward and constrained conformity, but concerning which they lack a freely given inward conviction. The roots of the theory of alienation, then, reach down into the rejection of “constraint,” into the disjunction in which constraint is experienced as powerful-but-wrong; it is a response to the perception of this violation of the grammar of societal rationality and an effort to overcome such an “unpermitted social world.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Cited in Georg Lukács, The Young Hegel (London: Merlin Press, 1975), p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For fuller discussion of the differences between tragic and ideologic discourse see Alvin W. Gouldner, The Dialectic of Ideology and Technology (New York: Seabury Press, 1976), chap. 3, “Surmounting the Tragic Vision.”

    Google Scholar 

  3. The quotations in this paragraph are all from F. Engels, Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (New York: International Publishers, 1935), pp. 70–71. Italics added. These are chapters from Anti-Dühring.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marx and Engels, Historisch-kritische Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt; Marx-Engels Institut, 1927–1935), vol. 1, p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Karl Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. I, translated from the 4th German ed. by Eden and Cedar Paul, published in 2 vols., with an introduction by G. D. H. Cole (London and Toronto: J. M. Dent & Sons, 1930), vol. 1, p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Israel, Alienation: From Marx to Modern Sociology (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1971), p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, authorized English edition of 1888, supervised by Engels, published by Charles H. Kerr, Chicago, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karl Marx, “Randglossen zur Adolph Wagner’s ‘Lehrbuch der politischen Ökonomie,’” in Marx-Engels, Werke, Institut für Marxismus-Leninismus (Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1956–58), vol. 19, pp. 370–71.

    Google Scholar 

  9. My analysis of the romantic, along with a systematic view of it as a deep structure implicated in both “normal” and Marxist sociologies is developed in chap. 11, “Romanticism and Classicism,” in Alvin W. Gouldner, For Sociology (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1975) pp. 323–68. Note especially my discussion of the grotesque as a theory of dissonance in relation to Kenneth Burke’s cognate concept of “perspective by incongruity.”

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1980 Alvin W. Gouldner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gouldner, A.W. (1980). Alienation from Hegel to Marx. In: The Two Marxisms. Critical Social Studies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16296-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics