Abstract
One of the pivotal issues between Critical and Scientific Marxists is the importance of “alienation” in the work of the mature Marx, and whether or not, as Scientific Marxists often believe, it was an Hegelian vestige that lost significance in his later work. Within Marx’s own tradition, the notion of alienation derives most immediately from Feuerbach and Hegel. The roots of Marx’s critique of alienation may be found, as Georg Lukàcs found them, in Hegel’s Protestantizing critique of “positivity.”1 In this critique, Hegel rejects as “dead” those human relationships or institutions in which persons give only an outward and constrained conformity, but concerning which they lack a freely given inward conviction. The roots of the theory of alienation, then, reach down into the rejection of “constraint,” into the disjunction in which constraint is experienced as powerful-but-wrong; it is a response to the perception of this violation of the grammar of societal rationality and an effort to overcome such an “unpermitted social world.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Cited in Georg Lukács, The Young Hegel (London: Merlin Press, 1975), p. 18.
For fuller discussion of the differences between tragic and ideologic discourse see Alvin W. Gouldner, The Dialectic of Ideology and Technology (New York: Seabury Press, 1976), chap. 3, “Surmounting the Tragic Vision.”
The quotations in this paragraph are all from F. Engels, Socialism: Utopian and Scientific (New York: International Publishers, 1935), pp. 70–71. Italics added. These are chapters from Anti-Dühring.
Marx and Engels, Historisch-kritische Gesamtausgabe (Frankfurt; Marx-Engels Institut, 1927–1935), vol. 1, p. 85.
Karl Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. I, translated from the 4th German ed. by Eden and Cedar Paul, published in 2 vols., with an introduction by G. D. H. Cole (London and Toronto: J. M. Dent & Sons, 1930), vol. 1, p. 78.
J. Israel, Alienation: From Marx to Modern Sociology (Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1971), p. 39.
Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, authorized English edition of 1888, supervised by Engels, published by Charles H. Kerr, Chicago, p. 32.
Karl Marx, “Randglossen zur Adolph Wagner’s ‘Lehrbuch der politischen Ökonomie,’” in Marx-Engels, Werke, Institut für Marxismus-Leninismus (Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1956–58), vol. 19, pp. 370–71.
My analysis of the romantic, along with a systematic view of it as a deep structure implicated in both “normal” and Marxist sociologies is developed in chap. 11, “Romanticism and Classicism,” in Alvin W. Gouldner, For Sociology (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1975) pp. 323–68. Note especially my discussion of the grotesque as a theory of dissonance in relation to Kenneth Burke’s cognate concept of “perspective by incongruity.”
Copyright information
© 1980 Alvin W. Gouldner
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gouldner, A.W. (1980). Alienation from Hegel to Marx. In: The Two Marxisms. Critical Social Studies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16296-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16296-3_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-28880-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16296-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)