Skip to main content

A ‘Stages Approach’ to Comparative Advantage

  • Chapter
Economic Growth and Resources

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to analyse the changing pattern of comparative advantage in the process of economic development. The investigation will be limited to exports, since the commodity pattern of imports is greatly influenced by the system of protection in the importing countries. And as trade in natural resource products depends to a considerable extent on the country’s resource endowment, we will deal with comparative advantage in manufactured goods alone.

The author is Professor of Political Economy at the Johns Hopkins University and Consultant to the World Bank. The paper presented at the Congress was prepared in the framework of a consultant arrangement with the World Bank but it should not be interpreted to reflect the Bank’s views. The author is indebted to Dominique de Crayencour, Jonathan Levy and especially to Kishore Nadkarni for research assistance. He has benefited from comments on an earlier version of the paper by T. N. Srinivasan and other participants in a seminar held at the World Bank.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balassa, B., 1965, ‘Trade Liberalization and Revealed Comparative Advantage’, Manchester School, May, vol. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B., 1969, ‘Country Size and Trade Patterns: Comment’, American Economic Review, March, vol. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin. R. E., 1971, ‘Determinants of the Commodity Structure of U.S. Trade’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, March, vol. 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerji, R., 1975, Exports of Manufactures from India (Kieler Studien, Institut für Weltwirtschaft an der Universität Kiel, JCB Mohr ( Paul Siebeck ), Tübingen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson. W. H., 1973. ‘Factor Inputs. U.S. Trade, and the Heckscher—Ohlin Model’, Seminar Paper No. 27, Institute for International Economic Studies, University of Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson, W. H., and H. Junz, 1971, ‘Trends in U.S. Comparative Advantage’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A. B., 1972, ‘Influence of the Natural Resource Factor on the Comparative Advantage of Less-Developed Countries’, Inter-mountain Economic Review, Fall, vol. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, P. R., and P. R. G. Layard, 1975, ‘Capital-Skill Complementarity, Income Distribution, and Output Accounting’, Journal of Political Economy, April, vol. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fels, G.. 1972, ‘The Choice of Industry Mix in the Division of Labor between Developed and Developing Countries’. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Band 108. Heft I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, B., and R. Ceyhun, 1976, ‘U.S. Export Performance in Manufacturing Industries: An Empirical Investigation’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Band 112, Heft 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, W. H., and R. Vernon, 1970, ‘The Technology Factor in a World Trade Matrix’, in The Technology Factor in International Trade, ed. R. Vernon ( National Bureau of Economic Research, Columbia University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, F. H., J. Maruhnic and J. R. Resnick, 1970, Quantitative Analyses of Modernization and Development (Industrial Relations Section, Dept. of Economics, Princeton University, Princeton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, J., and J. F. Kyle, 1975, ‘Factors Influencing United States Comparative Advantage’, Journal of International Economics, May, vol. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helleiner, G. K., 1976, ‘Industry Characteristics and the Competitiveness of Manufactures from Less-Developed Countries’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Band 112, Heft 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, P. S., 1976, ‘Factor Endowment Change and Comparative Advantage’, Review of Economics and Statistics, August, vol. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B., 1975, The Optimal International Division of Labor ( International Labor Office. Geneva).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B., and J. Tinbergen, 1970, ‘Planning of International Development’, Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Economics, Budapest, April 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, S., 1974, ‘Capital or Technology? Confronting the Neo-Factor Proportions and the Neo-Technology Accounts of International Trade’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Band 110, Heft 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, S., 1975, ‘The Product Cycle Model of International Trade — A Multi-Country Cross Section Analysis’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics November, vol. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer, G. C., 1970, ‘The Impact of National Characteristics and Technology on the Commodity Composition of Trade in Manufactured Goods’, in The Technology Factor in International Trade, ed. R. Vernon ( National Bureau of Economic Research, Columbia University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. G., 1970, ‘The State of Theory in Relation to Empirical Analysis’ in The Technology Factor in International Trade, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenen, P. B.. 1965. ‘Nature, Capital and Trade’, Journal of Political Economy, October. vol. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojima. K., 1970, ‘Structure of Comparative Advantage in Industrial Countries: A Verification of the Factor-Proportions Theorem’, Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, June, vol. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A. O., 1974, Foreign Trade Regimes and Economic Development: Turkey, National Bureau of Economic Research, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lary, H. B., 1968, Imports of Manufactures from Less-Developed Countries, National Bureau of Economic Research. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lary, H. B., 1970, ‘Comments on The Technology Factor in a World Trade Matrix’ in The Technology Factor in International Trade, op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Learner, E., 1974, ‘The Commodity Composition of International Trade in Manufactures: An Empirical Analysis’, Oxford Economic Papers, November. vol. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahfuzur Rahman. A. H. M.. 1973, Exports of Manufactures from Developing Countries. ( Centre for Development Planning, Rotterdam University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morall, J. F., 1972, Human Capital, Technology & the Role of the U.S. in International Trade ( University of Florida Press, Gainesville).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schydlowsky, D. M. (forthcoming), ‘Argentina’, in Development Strategies in Semi-Industrial Countries by B. Balassa and Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern. R. M., 1975, ‘Testing Trade Theories’, in International Trade and Finance, ed. P. B. Kenen (Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Irma Adelman

Copyright information

© 1979 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balassa, B. (1979). A ‘Stages Approach’ to Comparative Advantage. In: Adelman, I. (eds) Economic Growth and Resources. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16229-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics