Abstract
W. V. Quine’s ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’1 is generally admitted to be one of the most important philosophical articles published this century. It is nominally, as the title suggests, an attack on empiricism. The ‘two dogmas’ which the paper attacks are, first, reductionism: ‘the belief that each meaningful statement is equivalent to some logical construction upon terms which refer to immediate experience’;2 and, secondly the belief that there is a clear distinction to be drawn between analytic truths, which are true in virtue of the meanings of the expressions employed in stating them, and synthetic truths, which are true, if at all, because some matter of fact is the case. But the hostility to empiricism is more apparent than real. Elsewhere Quine speaks of ‘two cardinal tenets of empiricism’ as remaining ‘unassailable… to this day’.3 The two cardinal tenets, as distinct from the two dogmas, are (1) that ‘whatever evidence there is for science is sensory evidence’,4 and (2) that ‘all inculcation of meanings of words must rest ultimately on sensory evidence’.5
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 1979 Bernard Harrison
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harrison, B. (1979). Meaning, Translation and Ontology. In: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. Modern Introductions to Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16227-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16227-7_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-12044-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-16227-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)