Skip to main content

Fixed versus Variable Coefficients — The Neo-classical Approach

  • Chapter
  • 59 Accesses

Abstract

Two characteristic features of most neo-classical growth models are some form of production function relating output to factor inputs and the absence of an investment function so that investment is determined passively by saving. Harrod’s model — set out in Chapter 1 — possesses neither of these features (though it could be argued that a production function of the kind we are about to introduce is implicit in the investment behaviour he assumes). But a model with these characteristics can be constructed having the same formal equilibrium properties as Harrod’s model proper, and it is this model which we shall explore in this section. It may seem more akin to Domar’s model, since that does have a kind of production function (equation (1.27) above) and since it does not possess an investment function; but the new model is not the same as that either. It may be regarded as the ‘neo-classical’ version of the Harrod-Domar models; it is what is called ‘the Harrod-Domar model’ in many textbooks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1979 Graham Hacche

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hacche, G. (1979). Fixed versus Variable Coefficients — The Neo-classical Approach. In: The Theory of Economic Growth. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16221-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics