Skip to main content

The Impact of Privacy upon Social Research

  • Chapter
Censuses, Surveys and Privacy

Abstract

This book is about the impact of one social, political and moral issue — privacy — upon contemporary social science. As social inquiry extends its scope, questions about the legitimacy of its inquiries and the rights of the individual citizen to be left alone are posed with increasing sharpness. Is it justifiable to ask members of the public questions in censuses and surveys about sensitive and private topics such as income or sexual behaviour? Is it justifiable to allow social scientists access to medical records in hospitals or doctors’ surgeries in order to advance science? Should different sets of records be linked together for purposes of statistical analysis, even though the individual citizens who originally provided the information believed that it would be treated as confidential? What legal safeguards are there to prevent the release or legal seizure of social-research data collected under promises of confidentiality?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Alan F. Westin, Privacy and Freedom, London, Bodley Head, 1970, p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. US Department of Health Education and Welfare, Records, Computers and the Rights of Citizens, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press, 1973, pp. 40–1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cf. E. Shils, ‘Privacy: its constitution and vicissitudes’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 31, 1966, p. 283, note 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. It has been argued that there is also a ‘private’ realm of secrecy. Cf. C. Warren and B. Laslett, ‘Privacy and secrecy: a conceptual comparison’, Journal of Social Issues, 33, 1977, pp. 43–51, who discuss stigmatised or disadvantaged minorities that use secrecy to conceal their behaviour. However, the examples used of sexual minorities are doubtfully generalisable.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. For a recent British example, cf. H. P. Wyn, ‘Freedom of statistical in-formation’, JRSS, A, 141, 1978, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For a discussion of this trend, cf. M. Bulmer (ed.), Social Policy Research, London, Macmillan, 1978, Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For an historical survey, see C. A. Moser and G. Kalton, Survey Methods in Social Investigation, London, Heinemann, 1971, Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. J. M. Adams and D. H. Haden, Social Effects of Computer Use and Misuse, New York, Wiley, 1976, Chapter 3, ‘The history of computation’.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Madgwick and T. Smythe, The Invasion of Privacy, London, Pitman, 1974, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For a succinct introduction to computers and privacy in general, see Alan F. Westin and M. A. Baker, Data Banks in a Free Society: computers, record-keeping and privacy, New York, Quadrangle Books, 1972, Chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. For general surveys, see Westin and Baker, op. cit.; US Department of Health Education and Welfare, Records, Computers and the Rights of Citizens, op. cit.; C. C. Gotlieb and A. A. Borodin, Social Issues in Computing, New York, Academic Press, 1973;

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. R. Miller, The Assault on Privacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan, University of Michigan Press, 1971;

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. Taviss (ed.), The Computer Impact, Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Privacy Protection Study Commission, Personal Privacy in an Information Society, Washington DC, US Government Printing Office, July 1977, pp. 3, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. American Statistical Association, ‘Report of Ad Hoc Committee on Privacy and Confidentiality’, The American Statistician, 31, May 1977, p. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  16. O. M. Ruebhausen and O. C. Brim, ‘Privacy and Behavioural Research’, The American Psychologist, 21, 1966, p. 426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M. Rein, Social Science and Public Policy, Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1977, p. 259.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. C. Kelman, ‘The Rights of the Subject in Social Research’, The American Psychologist, 27, 1972, p. 989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. See also H. C. Kelman, ‘Privacy and Research with Human Beings’, Journal of Social Issues, 33, 1977, pp. 169–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. For a discussion of one such case, see D. N. Kershaw and J. C. Small, ‘Data Confidentiality and Privacy: Lessons from the New Jersey Negative Income Tax Experiment’, Public Policy, 20, 1972, pp. 257–80.

    Google Scholar 

  21. For a fuller exposition and analysis, see E. Shils, ‘Privacy and Power’, in Center and Periphery: Essays on Macrosociology, University of Chicago Press, 1975, pp. 317–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1979 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bulmer, M. (1979). The Impact of Privacy upon Social Research. In: Bulmer, M. (eds) Censuses, Surveys and Privacy. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16184-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics